- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-mfc5890cn-{cupswrapper,lpr}
by Berno Strik 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Please merge [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-5890cn [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-cups-wrapper-mfc-5890cn [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-lpr-mfc-5890cn

2 1

[aur-general] [removal request] - linux-sun7i and sunxi-tools
by sehraf 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hi, please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because: - both are outdated and orphaned - linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3] - sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4] Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-sun7i/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunxi-tools/ [3] https://github.com/archlinuxarm/PKGBUILDs/tree/master/core/linux-sun7i [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunxi-tools-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Remove some xf86-video-intel-* packages
by Karol Blazewicz 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

1. According to the comments, xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 is just a duplicate of xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git. It has been orphaned. The only difference in PKGBUILDs (apart from the package name) is that xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 has 2 extra makedependencies: git and xorg-util-macros. At least git shold be added to the makedepends (as pointed out in the comments of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ by klusark - the user who uploaded xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 - but I think xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 should be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2/ 2. Are we OK with a package like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-conf-sna/ that provides only a 5-line config: Section "Device" Identifier "Intel Graphics" Driver "intel" Option "AccelMethod" "sna" EndSection It's an orphan with no votes and no comments.

2 2

[aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR
by Jonas Platte 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hello, please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see [2]) Thanks, Jonas Platte [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/ [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup
by WorMzy Tykashi 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hi TUs, Please could you remove the following packages: redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a non-existent redirfs-modules package. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/

2 1

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-295cn
by Berno Strik 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. (See bottom of this mail). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-295cn From: Berno Strik <dutchman55(a)gmx.com> To: aarcila(a)marketext.com Subject: AUR package brother-mfc-295cn Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:54:32 +0100 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Are you willing to disown this package so that I can fix it? -- With regards, Berno Strik <dutchman55(a)gmx.com>

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Request: PKGBUILD removal of (sysdig|sysdig-git)
by Martti Kühne 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, <scimmia(a)archlinux.info> wrote: > On 2014-04-04 07:46, Borja wrote: >> >> Hi chaps! >> >> I would like to requestthe removal the one of this two PKGBUILD: >> >> - sysdig >> - sysdig-git >> >> I've comitted both of them by mistake. I would say that maybe it's better >> to >> keep sysdig? Or maybe guys you think it's better to keep sysdig-git just >> in >> case the people from Draios Inc. will add support to Arch to their >> installer? >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> ================================================================================= >> >> GPG key ID 4CA6E08B -- https://www.libcrack.so/ > > > I believe you wanted the aur-general mailing list, not arch-general. CCing to aur-general for completeness. cheers! mar77i

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data
by Shohei Kusakata 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

Hello, Please delete this package: openspades-data https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/ because I intergrated the package into openspades (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/) Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0