- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn
by Saulteau Don 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

Thanks for the clarification Doug and the wiki reference. It was helpful. Donovan. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Doug Newgard <scimmia22(a)outlook.com> wrote: > ---------------------------------------- > > 1. They are not the same, one pulls from a branch, the other pulls from trunk. > 2. When pulling from trunk, -svn is the correct name. > 3. You are using a very old PKGBUILD template. Please see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: rb-fsevent
by Jerome Leclanche 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rb-fsevent/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rb-fsevent/ J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: rb-inotify
by Jerome Leclanche 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rb-inotify/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rb-inotify/ The latter is the more up to date and correctly named package. J. Leclanche

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
by danielwallace 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

Did anyone step up for ceph? I have been messing with that and was working on adding modules and states to salt. If no one has stepped up I will look into moving it this weekend probably. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Jonathan Steel <mail(a)jsteel.org> Date:03/05/2014 3:10 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]? On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 20:21, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote: > > [...] > > Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers, > > rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to > > create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to > > vagrant-installers for PKGBUILDs. > > [...] > > I have started looking at the best way to package it. I'll propose my > changes to you once I'm happy with it and if you would be happy to maintain > it in the AUR for a little time (or I could take over it) to allow people > to test the changes before moving it to [community] I think that would be > best. > [...] What's your opinion on how the packages ruby-vagrant and vagrant-git do it? Before I even looked at those, that's the approach I was going for. -- Jonathan Steel

5 6

[aur-general] AUR package deletion request: fbmessenger-git
by Jack O'Connor 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

The "fbmessenger-git" package has stopped working -- APIs it depended on have been removed -- so it should be deleted from the AUR. Is there a process for doing that? Thanks, Jack O'Connor

2 1

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Rikard Falkeborn 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

Hello, Please merge/delete the following: Merge haxe-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haxe-svn] into haxe-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haxe-git] (upstream switched to git) Merge htop-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/htop-svn] into htop-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/htop-git] (upstream switched to git) Delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osgocean-git/ (or possible merge into [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osgocean-git/] According to maintainers comment, it was uploaded by mistake and should have been an svn-package. The packages has no votes and no comments except for one saying it was accidently uploaded as a -git package. Best regards,

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Mar '14

08 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-4 (i686) * cgminer-4.1.0-1 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-7 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-26 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.8-2 (i686) * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-4 (x86_64) * cgminer-4.1.0-1 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-26 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.8-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cgminer-4.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cgminer-4.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge request - you-get-git
by lilydjwg 07 Mar '14

07 Mar '14

Please merge python-you-get-git[1] into you-get-git[2] as it's used primarily as a tool, not as a library. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-you-get-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/you-get-git/ -- Best regards, lilydjwg

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn
by Saulteau Don 07 Mar '14

07 Mar '14

Afternoon TU's. Seeking guidance and advice, I'd like to propose that qwtpolar-svn[1] be merged into qwtpolar[2] in the AUR if I'm following procedures properly here =) I'm trying to clean these qwtpolar packages up a bit. They were both recently orphaned so I upgraded qwtpolar[2] to latest release which is also the same as qwtpolar-svn[1]. SaultDon [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar/

2 1

[aur-general] Axiom (CAS) -- Same program, three packages (and licenses)?
by oliver 07 Mar '14

07 Mar '14

Hi, I'm a bit confused about the Axiom-packages available on AUR: There is axiom-cas may2012-1 modified-BSD pointing to http://www.axiom-developer.org/ ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/axiom-cas/ ) open-axiom 1.4.2-4 custom pointing to http://www.open-axiom.org ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/open-axiom/ ) open-axiom-svn 1082-1 GPL2 pointing to http://www.open-axiom.org ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/open-axiom-svn/ ) It looks like all three packages refer to the same program: the Axiom-CAS. Looks a bit messy to me. Can someone bring order into this? Thanks, Oliver

4 5