- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Please delete wicd-eduroam-rub
by Michael Düll 06 Mar '14

06 Mar '14

Hi! I am the maintainer of wicd-eduroam-rub [1]. Our university has switched eduroam to TTLS-MSCHAPv2 which wicd cannot do [2]. So this package is not working anymore and won't work in the future either. Please delete it. Thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wicd-eduroam-rub/ [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/wicd#Bad_password_using_PEAP_with_TKIP…

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Mar '14

06 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests: django-maintenancemode, django-agpl, perl-term-statusline
by Jason St. John 06 Mar '14

06 Mar '14

Hello, The source and upstream URLs for these are broken, so they can be safely deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-maintenancemode/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-agpl/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-term-statusline/ Thanks, Jason

2 3

[aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
by Ido Rosen 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Massimiliano Torromeo and/or Jonathan Steel: Just following up to your previous posts below. Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers, rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to vagrant-installers for PKGBUILDs. For ceph, it's a pretty typical conf/make/install. A lot of customization/flexibility should be left for the user in the ceph case, and adding a wiki page would be a good idea as well. Ceph stable releases are approx. every 3 months, so it is predictable and relatively low-maintenance, whereas Vagrant has more bursty releases. If you take ceph, you will probably find it useful to adopt ceph-git in AUR as well. Cheers, Ido On Fri Feb 21 17:20:39 EST 2014, Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torromeo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >I would be interested if building from source wouldn't probably mean to >also move a dozen ruby dependencies or use bundler. > >I will probably move ceph, which you are also maintaining, though. > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Jonathan Steel <mail at jsteel.org> wrote: > > > On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful > > tool > > > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; > > > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you > > TUs > > > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get > > > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, > > so > > > it has been very easy to maintain overall. > > > > > > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ > > > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ > > > > > > Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can > > > submit > > > a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under > > > the aur/vagrant directory). > > > > > I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a > > bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start > > looking at moving it/the best way to package it. > > > > -- > > Jonathan Steel > >

2 2

[aur-general] Removal: capifax
by Bjoern Franke 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hi, please remove capifax[1], capifax does not exist any more regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/capifax/ -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Simon Lipp 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fantasdic/ Abandoned by upstream (not me in this case ;)) ; does not run anymore since it depends upon ruby-libglade which is not included anymore in recent ruby-gnome bindings. Regards, Simon Lipp

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Simon Lipp 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/ Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which is already in community. Regards, Simon Lipp

2 1

[aur-general] Merge and deletion requests regarding slime packages.
by Stefan Husmann 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hello, the "Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs" is now maintained on GitHub. So my package slime-cvs [1] should be merged into slime-git [2]. slime-snapshot [3] host sources on AUR and should be removed or changed to use a GitHub snapshot. There is also emacs-slime [4], fulfilling a similar purpose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slime-cvs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slime-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slime-snapshot/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-slime/ We once had a slime package in [community]. The name of the cvs-packege and now the git packge was modeled after this. Should slime-git be renamed to emacs-slime-git? Best Regards Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static
by ked 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Please delete my own packages: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0