- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Please remove unused versioned ruby packages
by Anatol Pomozov 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi, Following versioned packages are obsolete. Please remove them. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-memoizable-0.2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-msgpack-0.4/

2 3

[aur-general] Moving subtle to AUR
by Alexander Rødseth 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi, The subtle package (a window manager) was blocking the ruby 2.1 TODO list. The build scripts specifically checks for ruby version 1.9. When disabling that check, it has problems linking/compiling and it also does not respect the CFLAGS variable. Tried to patch it with sed, with no luck. If someone wish to give it a stab, it's now in AUR. If it should successfully build and run with Ruby 2.1 in the future (2.1 is currently in [staging]), I would be happy to consider moving it back to [community]. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * luminancehdr-2.3.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-1.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shotwell-0.15.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-1.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.15.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request merge of python-fftw3 into python2-fftw3
by Paul Viren 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

I renamed it because the python bindings are python2 only. Note that there are two sets of python bindings for fftw. This package uses the older one called PyFFTW3. There is another package called python2-fftw, but that uses a newer set of bindings called PyFFTW. There seem to be a fair number of arch users using the older bindings.

2 1

[aur-general] moving libpaper to extra / new (Calligra/LibO) Office related libs
by Andreas Radke 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

I'd like to make use of libpaper in Ghostscript, Cups and LibreOffice. So I will move it to extra and will maintain it there. Also I was told that Callibre can make use of certain libraries in future versions that are already part of the internal LibreOffice sources. I will do some investigation and will decide if we make them system libs so we can do shared linking to these libs. Please have a look at the PKGBUILD, what internal sources we will use in LibO 4.2 : https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD.42… -Andy

3 3

[aur-general] AUR split package submission error
by Michael Schubert 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Hi, I'm trying to update my package blast+-bin, but I get an "the AUR does not support split packages" error. The package is not split (as in, it does not create two packages) but it uses a hack to use platform-dependent sources and md5sums. Is there any recommendation on how to handle such cases?- I didn't find anything on the wiki. PKGBUILD: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bl/blast+-bin/PKGBUILD cheers Michael

3 3

Re: [aur-general] Help regarding some AUR packages
by Felix Yan 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 15:27:58 you wrote: > Hi, > > You may not remember me. I contacted you a few months regarding the > deletion of one of my packages. Since you did seem to be accessible, I > thought it was a good idea to ask for your help. > > I have two issues. > The first is that I want 2 of my packages to be deleted. > The first is: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/julia-cumatrix-git/(upstream is dead, > and the package does not even build anymore). Removed, thanks. > The second is libscl (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libscl/) This is > still alive (I know the author). But the library uses C++ from the 90s and > there are just better projects out there, so I have zero interest in it > (perhaps it would be better to orphan it?). Yes, I believe it better to just orphan it :) > I know that there is a mailing list to ask for deletion, but I sent a > request months ago and it never showed up on AUR-general. Do you know why > that is so? I submitted another request to AUR-general today, but I am not > very optimistic about it. Hmm, this is strange, I'm CC'ing the list to see if anyone can help you with this. > The second problem is that my shc package ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shc/) does not build anymore because the > sha256 of the source changed. This is weird because there is no mention of > a new version or anything like that (and I am pretty sure that it was not > my mistake, I keep multiple backup copies of my PKGBUILDs). I emailed the > author about 2 weeks ago and got no reply. > What should I do in this case since I do not trust that upstream's website > was not compromised? I guess it's better to just leave a comment on AUR page (as you already did) and update the checksums. As it is indeed the upstream url and you cannot get in touch with him, I don't see any better choice :( > Please let me know if you can help, and sorry for the long email. Regards, Felix Yan

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request outdated packages: pyscard, pyscard-svn
by Jonas Heinrich 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Hello, following packages are out of date, doesn't match naming conventions and superseded by python-pyscard-svn [1] and python2-pyscard [2]: pyscard [3], pyscard-svn [4] Please remove them, thank you. Jonas [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyscard-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyscard/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyscard/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyscard-svn/

2 1

[aur-general] Package Merging.
by Jagmjp Janpgm 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Could chromium-pepper-flash be merged into chromium-pepper-flash-dev as it's more appropriate name? I'm the maintainer of both of them.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mixcloud-dl
by Jordi De Groof 22 Jan '14

22 Jan '14

Hi, Please remove mixcloud-dl [1], the program is no longer functioning. I'm the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mixcloud-dl/ Regards, Jordi De Groof

2 1