- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] disown request: fplll
by xantares 09 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hello, The package fplll is not updated since 6 months, maintainer is inactive https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfplll/ Regards,

2 2

[aur-general] Please Review: mock-git: Mock takes an SRPM and builds RPM packages from it in a chroot
by Peter Littmann 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

I just uploaded this tool and please you to send me your comments about the included PKGBUILD. Will this be okay in this form or should it better be improved and what? The check runs for a while but then ended with failures but I think these are somewhere in Enterprise Linux cause the fedora seems not to be a problem. Thanks a lot for all your works in AUR.

2 1

[aur-general] libftdi merge request
by xantares 09 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, Could mingw-w64-libftdi1 be renamed to mingw-w64-libftdi https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libftdi1/ That way it'll be consistent with the renaming in extra repo: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libftdi/ Regards, xan.

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (i686) * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-tornado-3.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-tornado-3.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alex Forencich 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

These packages should be deleted as they were renamed some time ago: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyivi-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyvxi11-git/ Thanks Alex Forencich

2 1

[aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests [Jan 15]
by Limao Luo 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

2 1

[aur-general] Can we force the maintainer to change package name?
by Karol Blazewicz 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rstudio/ is something entirely different than every other 'rstudio' package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?&K=rstudio A few users suggested name change. Can we force the maintainer to change package name? Does the package have to be properly disowned and reuploaded with a different name?

3 9

[aur-general] tint2 packages cleanup
by WorMzy Tykashi 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Hi, Please remove (or merge with [1]) the following packages: tint2-svn-gnome-shell [2] -- using an archaic PKGBUILD template, relies on patches not included in the source array. tint2-graph [3] -- is incorrectly named (uses svn), uses old PKGBUILD template, is orphaned, and is redundant (tint2-svn applies the same patch). Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn-gnome-shell/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-graph/

2 1

[aur-general] Bundled applications policy?
by WorMzy Tykashi 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Hi, What is the policy regarding collection/amalgamation packages? 'manarchy' [1] is just a recent beta version of aircrack-ng (stable version in community) and an updated version of 'theharvester' [2] bundled together. Should [1] be removed/merged into [2], or should it split up into individual packages, or is it perfectly acceptable to have packages like this? Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/manarchy/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/theharvester/

3 7

[aur-general] Deletion request: wxgtk3.0
by Rafael Ferreira 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Hi there. wxgtk3.0 [1], package created and maintained by me, isn't needed anymore since this version is already in [community]. Please delete it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxgtk3.0/ Thanks, Rafael Ferreira

2 1