- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] package deletion
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Hi guys, Please delete the following packages owned by me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-mpi-3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-407/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl84/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk84/ Both gromacs packages were needed at the lab i used to work, but now they were phased out and no interest appeared on them from the community. The last two were required by pymol-svn for some time, but not anymore. Although they have some votes, i honestly cant recall when they were cast. Thanks. -- Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos

2 1

[aur-general] xapian-omega orphan request
by Lester B 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Good day! Please orphan the package xapian-omega[1]. I had asked the maintainer and replied that I am free to adopt it. Thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xapian-omega/ Sincerely, Lestb

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: python-wikitools
by Jerome Leclanche 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Does not support python 3. Package exists at python2-wikitools. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-wikitools/ J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libtaginfo-0.2.0-1 (i686) * xnoise-0.2.20-1 (i686) * libtaginfo-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) * xnoise-0.2.20-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * libtaginfo-0.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xnoise-0.2.20-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xnoise-0.2.20-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 8 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request for mingw-w64-qt5-jsbackend
by Philip A Reimer 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Qt 5.2 deprecated qtjsbackend switching to V4. It has already been removed from core. Could someone please remove it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-qt5-jsbackend [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt5-jsbackend-git -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSq4MLAAoJEBXbY7Xe8exMlkMH/0GMYqstNkSdOi7opKhtekif uMed+5pP+ZbIHaQkrqf/iHt+71YrXvwQbS+tdF2U/AFi9biNBVwKx4ldrBSN6I7j XTTnw078RS0/JfbNYDukrF52mk+YkhrJh2QQ4xif+2tkWaV384Al8CXbttKTfVsJ qTrY0dtGY9Xue4ADGJLtyfN4ORt8txDa9HKOFKCbkBNWVR0lfgLawtP6sZQ7oysR iIP6DD9cT6ZIRcwWDlb0uyFLCXYr71ZU2iUxmwQhKeQpMTURpcbRznQ61iuTo9OZ wlJu8EctvwmTwA2uElt7k9YJqGnsBkYcFBMwTlYqjyca8Ro9hTErVYc874Y6FPw= =h6Ev -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion request: tcc-static-musl and tcc-static-musl-git
by ked 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

Instead tcc-static-musl and tcc-static-musl-git may be used tcc-musl-static Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] AUR Registration
by Daazed McFarland 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

Not really sure if I am going about this the correct way. I have attempted to register in the AUR and I still have not received a confirmation email. I think I registered about 2 days ago.

3 3

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for xf86-input-wiimote-git
by David Manouchehri 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

There wasn't really any point in trying to "fix" the PKGBUILD, it was broken and needed a rewrite (outdated pkgver, git downloading, broken URLs and wrong package name). Also, there were comments about the package not working from months ago and the maintainer hadn't responded to them. I think it's fair? Also, thanks to Felix for the quick action. On 12/13/2013 04:54 PM, aur-general-request(a)archlinux.org wrote: > On 12/13/2013 12:54 AM, Felix Yan wrote: >> > On Friday, December 13, 2013 02:51:35 David Manouchehri wrote: >>> >> I've placed a new package under the proper name xf86-input-xwiimote-git. >>> >> I've asked Herrmann (dvdhrm) if he wants to maintain it himself (which >>> >> is why I orphaned it); if he doesn't, then I'll pick it back up myself. >>> >> >>> >> xf86-input-wiimote-git can be deleted. >> > >> > Removed, thanks. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Felix Yan >> > > I agree that it could have been deleted, but no one even attempted to ping the > maintainer to see if there was a reason for the PKGBUILD...

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request for [linux-xen].
by Evan Teitelman 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

Please remove linux-xen[1]. Xen support is enabled in core/x86_64/linux. Since Xen support is disabled in core/i686/linux due to its PAE dependency[2], Xen support was enabled in linux-pae[3]. The linux-xen packages is out-dated and no longer necessary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xen [2] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-October/014142… [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-pae/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request for xf86-input-wiimote-git
by David Manouchehri 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

I've placed a new package under the proper name xf86-input-xwiimote-git. I've asked Herrmann (dvdhrm) if he wants to maintain it himself (which is why I orphaned it); if he doesn't, then I'll pick it back up myself. xf86-input-wiimote-git can be deleted. -- David Manouchehri

3 2