- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] merge request smali2 into smali
by Levente Polyak 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

Hello all, please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2] smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version. As smali got disowned yesterday, i adopted it and updated it to 2.0 after speaking to JesusFreke (the author of smali, who pointed out that 1.4 is a dead end). After also speaking to Fernando (smali2 submitter) we agreed that smali2 got obsolete and he disowned slami2. kind regards, Levente [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali2/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali/

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: backintime-kde4
by member graysky 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

The split pkg 'backintime' provides the same binaries as 'backintime-kde4' rendering the later redundant. I checked with the current maintainer of 'backintime-kde4' and he/she agrees. This request is to delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/backintime-kde4 Please cc my on any reply as I am not subscribed. Thanks,

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request: pyobfsproxy -> obfsproxy
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

Package [pyobfsproxy][1] should be merged to [obfsproxy][2], because the upstream project name does not changed, only a python version replaces the old C version, and package [obfsproxy][2] has been updated with the python version. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyobfsproxy/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obfsproxy/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs 2. pierre - 2 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] kfaenza-icon-theme disown
by Daniele Formichelli 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, I would like to disown package kfaenza-icon-them from maintainer JokerBoy. He has not responded to comments on the AUR page ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme/) and it doesn't build Thank you, Daniele Formichelli

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request: libgpod-git-iphone -> libgpod-git
by Ivan Shapovalov 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, Please, merge libgpod-git-iphone[1] package into libgpod-git[2] since it is carrying a patch currently applied in the upstream. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgpod-git-iphone/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgpod-git/ Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Please, merge prettyping-mercurial[1] into prettyping-hg[2]. I've renamed it according to the naming guideline for mercurial packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prettyping-mercurial/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prettyping-hg/ Thanks -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] Brackets disown
by Daniele Formichelli 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, the package brackets is flagged as out of date and doesn't work since September, 6th. The maintainer doesn't reply neither to email nor comments on aur. I would like to adopt it, is it possible to make it orphan?

3 4

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: links-g-directfb
by Maxime Gauduin 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:20 PM, <lukas.graetz(a)web.de> wrote: > Dear Maxime, > > > There was no need to create a duplicate thread for this. > I'm sorry for seending sending you duplicates. I was irritadet because I > got no answer like > > You sent your > > mail to JokerBoy on the 5th, there is still one day left before we can > > disown the package. > before. I thought you hadn't noticed my mail. > Anyway, I still got no answer from Jokerboy. Could you disown it jet, > please? > lks > Package disowned, you're free to grab it. -- Maxime

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. tpowa - 10 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0