- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: Daenyth
by Balló György 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

2013/8/28 Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de>: > ----- Forwarded message from Daenyth <daenyth%2Barch(a)gmail.com> ----- > > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:59:55 -0400 > From: Daenyth <daenyth%2Barch(a)gmail.com> > To: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> > Subject: Re: TU Votes -- Reminder! > > Hi Lukas, > > I think I must have missed doing this earlier, but unfortunately I find that I > have to resign my position as a TU. It's been a lot of fun and I've really > enjoyed working alongside so many great people and learning through it, but I > have a lot of new things going on in my life these days that doesn't leave me > time for the responsibility. > > Could you please forward this email to the AUR list as well? I unsubscribed > some time ago. > > Warm regards, > -Gavin > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> > wrote: > > I am sending this mail to all TUs who skipped three (or more) votes (in > succession). Guys, I really appreciate all your work but please remember > that all TUs *must* take part in votes. If there are too many TUs > neglecting votes, we fail to reach quorums and TU power stagnates. Also > keep in mind that skipping too many votes automatically triggers a > special TU removal... > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > Cheers, > Lukas > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- According to the Trusted User Bylaws, I think we should vote about the removal of an inactive TU, Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth). So I'm starting the discussion period of 3 days. 1. His last activity on the [community] repo: 2012-05-17 2. His last package update in AUR: 2013-04-24 3. His last message to aur-general mailing list: 2012-06-24 Gavin, thank you for your work on making Arch Linux better. I hope that once we'll see you again! -- György Balló (City-busz) Trusted User

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (28 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 5 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 4. pierre - 3 signoffs 5. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete requests
by Doug Newgard 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

terminology-guake-git pulls from a branch of terminology that hasn't been updated since Oct of last year, when terminology was in it's infancy. I can't get a response from the author, either. This package has just become useless cruft, so I'm requesting it be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/terminology-guake-git/ Long dead upstream and hasn't built for years: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ei8k-module-svn/ Dead upstream and no development since the last release, making it a duplicate of the release package already in the AUR. Nothing worth merging, so just needs deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb-git/ Enlightenment used to have a DM called Entrance. It's long gone, but there was another one written named Elsa. After the original Entrance died, Elsa was renamed to Entrance. The entrance-themes package is for the old, non-existant Entrance, so it needs to be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/entrance-themes/ A lot of work was done on ffmpeg-compat in [community] a while ago, so now acestream can use that. The acestream-ffmpeg package is no longer needed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acestream-ffmpeg/ Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python-xlrd3
by Aaron DeVore 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

xlrd3 was a third party effort to port xlrd to Python 3. The fork was never complete, xlrd now has full Python 3 support, and the package is orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-xlrd3/ -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 23 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (23 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request : catalyst-131-dkms
by yadieet still alive 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Hi, Please remove : - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst-131-dkms/ Actually this package is 'catalyst 13.1 non-legacy for linux kernel >= 3.10 (support xorg-server 1.13)'. But for some reason, I've changed this package and I decided to cancel this package. So, this package is useless. Thanks, -- Yadieet SA.

2 1

[aur-general] Forgot Username
by nudelmobby 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Dear aur-general, the password reset site tells me to write here in case I forgot my email, well for me it's the other way around. I know my email (this one) and can happily change my password (which I naturally forgot as well, silly me), however no username is sent alongside the password link. Can you help me on this matter? Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] btrfs-progs packages
by WorMzy Tykashi 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

Hi, I've submitted two new btrfs packages to the AUR: btrfs-progs-unstable-integration [0] and btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git [1], and I'd like opinions on the state of things: a) should btrfs-progs-git [2] should be merged with btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git, given that the latter is more true to it's name as a -git package, and the former is more of a lagging stable version of the "non-git" integration branch or b) should the non-git, btrfs-progs-unstable-integration package be dropped in favour of the more stable btrfs-progs-git package or c) should all three packages remain or d) should the unstables be merged into one PKGBUILD with the option to let the user choose between "stable" and "next" by setting a variable in it? or e) something else? Personally, I'm happy maintaining all three packages, but I'm aware that I have just tripled the number of btrfs-progs packages in the AUR, which may cause some confusion with some users, and may be considered littering the AUR. Some further information which may be useful: btrfs-progs-git = stable, but stale (no commits since July 5th) btrfs-progs-unstable-integration = unstable, but known to build, snapshot of the integration-next (git) branch btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git = most unstable, actively committed to, may not always build Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-unstable-integration/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-git/

2 6