- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Various merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

>> Karol Blazewicz asked an excellent question. What's next, do you want to >> adopt them? >> > I may adopt a few but not all. I am hoping that by orphaning them, an active > maintainer may pick them up and fix/update them. That list is huge. I can certainly pick up a couple, but some of them look horribly outdated; is it an option to delete the ones that haven't been updated in - say - 12 months just to bring it down to a manageable number? It would be a waste of resources to spend time on a package that nobody is using anymore.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

I understand, no problem! I adopted broadcom-wl-dkms. Would the people that had notifications on broadcom-wl-dkms (the one that was accidentally deleted) get those notifications again going forward? Otherwise I'll post something on the forums. Thanks! On Monday, July 08, 2013 07:50:33 Frank Vanderham wrote: > Folks, > > Sorry, as I mentioned in the original request, I needed everything merged > into broadcom-wl-dkms, not broadcom-wl6-dkms, which was one of the packages > to be deleted. Is there a way that this can still be done? Or should I > create a new package called broadcom-wl-dkms and re-merge? > > Packages in question: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl6-dkms/ > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-dkms/ (had the latest > PKGBUILD but doesn't exist anymore, should have been the "final" one) > > Thanks! Sorry I must had my brain messed up... Restored the latest version of broadcom-wl-dkms and merged the other into it. Please go ahead and adopt the "new" package, thanks and sorry again! Regards, Felix Yan

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Folks, Sorry, as I mentioned in the original request, I needed everything merged into broadcom-wl-dkms, not broadcom-wl6-dkms, which was one of the packages to be deleted. Is there a way that this can still be done? Or should I create a new package called broadcom-wl-dkms and re-merge? Packages in question: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl6-dkms/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-dkms/ (had the latest PKGBUILD but doesn't exist anymore, should have been the "final" one) Thanks! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Felix Yan <felixonmars(a)gmail.com> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" < aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Cc: Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:34:23 +0800 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms On Sunday, July 07, 2013 22:26:20 Frank Vanderham wrote: > Just a friendly reminder of this request I made a couple of days ago: > please let me know if there is info missing or if there is a problem: > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Frank Vanderham <twelve.eighty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > To clean up the naming and confusion around the various DKMS Broadcom > > drivers out on AUR, please perform the following: > > > > * merge the comments, history, etc. from wireless-bcm43142-dkms into > > broadcom-wl-dkms > > * merge the comments, history from broadcom-wl6-dkms into broadcom-wl-dkms > > > > This means that those three packages should now be just one: > > broadcom-wl-dkms. The current PKGBUILD of broadcom-wl-dkms is already the > > latest, so going forward that is the maintained version. Both merged. Please include links to packages next time, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: massif-visualizer
by Christian Bielert 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

massif-visualizer [1] hasn't been updated in 18 months, is broken and has a (working) suggestion to fix it, equally old, sitting there. I've sent a mail to the current maintainer over 2 weeks ago and received no response. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/massif-visualizer/

2 1

[aur-general] pytransmissionrpc deletion
by Cédric Girard 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi, pytransmissionrpc [1] may be removed as it as been replaced by python2-transmissionrpc [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pytransmissionrpc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-transmissionrpc/ Regards -- Cédric Girard

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Murrine and Ubuntu themes
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I just fixed the name of two of my packages, please merge the old versions: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/murrine-themes-collection/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubuntu-community-themes/ Into the new ones: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-murrine-collection/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ubuntu-community/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Finery GTK
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I already contacted the actual maintainer of gtk-themes-finery[1] and he's ok to merge the package into this one[2] with a better name and the dependencies fixed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-themes-finery/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-finery/ p.s.: also delete this, I made it for a mistake: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/finery-gtk-theme/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Hope GTK
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, hope-gtk-theme[1] is a duplicate with less votes and wrong name of gtk-theme-hope[2]. Please merge the former into the latter. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hope-gtk-theme/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-hope/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (i686) * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (i686) * fswebcam-20110717-3 (i686) * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (i686) * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (i686) * perl-gd-2.49-4 (i686) * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (i686) * sarg-2.3.6-3 (i686) * vnstat-1.11-7 (i686) * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (x86_64) * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (x86_64) * fswebcam-20110717-3 (x86_64) * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (x86_64) * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (x86_64) * perl-gd-2.49-4 (x86_64) * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (x86_64) * sarg-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) * vnstat-1.11-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * perl-gd-2.49-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * perl-gd-2.49-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0