- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] "Please merge the (orphaned) hotot-qt-git to hotot-qt4-git"
by Yichao Yu 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hotot supports qt5 (hotot-qt5) now. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hotot-qt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hotot-qt-git/

2 2

[aur-general] proftpd
by Alexander Rødseth 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hi, I wish to give proftpd to a TU/Dev or move it to unsupported if there is no interest for it. Any takers? -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 May '13

14 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * inn-2.5.3-5 (i686) * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (i686) * squid-3.3.4-3 (i686) * inn-2.5.3-5 (x86_64) * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (x86_64) * squid-3.3.4-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * autofs-5.0.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 13 signoffs 2. bisson - 9 signoffs 3. dan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request ownership transfer and/or merge
by |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hello! I was wondering if you could possibly transfer my ownership of my 'archtrack' AUR package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack/) to "EvanTeitelman" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=EvanTeitelman&SeB=m)? Another possibility would be to merge Evan's 'archtrack-all' package into the 'archtrack' package and make him the owner. Evan, please respond if you have any preference. Thanks! -- |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |

3 2

[aur-general] python2-crack question
by Gabriel B. Casella 13 May '13

13 May '13

Hello everyone, I have adopted my first package[1] on AUR (=D) and would like to know if is there a need to increase the "pkgrel" variable as I fixed a small error in the "build()" and "package()" functions. Also, I changed the sums to SHA256 instead of MD5. By the way, this package has the MIT/X license (python stuff) and I've seen on the PKGBUILD wiki [2] that, in this case, the license should be stored in /usr/share/licenses/pkg. But, would this be just copying it to the folder or what? Sincerely, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-crack/ [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license *---* *Gabriel B. Casella* "Nothing is impossible, impossible just takes longer"

3 5

[aur-general] Merge stjerm in stjerm-git
by Diego Principe 13 May '13

13 May '13

Please merge stjerm in stjerm-git because git now is the only source avaiable. *Diego*

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 May '13

13 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * znc-1.0-6 (i686) * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * autofs-5.0.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown 'rethinkdb' aur package
by Anatol Pomozov 12 May '13

12 May '13

Hi, rethinkdb is a great alternative to mongodb. There is an aur package for it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rethinkdb Unfortunately it is out-of-date for almost 2 months now. The current maintainer does not respond to upgrade requests. Please disown the package, I would like to become its maintainer and keep it improving. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Fwd:
by Tim Yang 12 May '13

12 May '13

http://www.acst-h.co.jp/tklfjx.php

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: otf-latinmodern
by Hilton Medeiros 12 May '13

12 May '13

Hello, please merge the package otf-latinmodern[1] into otf-latin-modern[2], since the maintainer of otf-latinmodern said in the comments that he won't update his package anymore despite having more votes. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-latinmodern/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-latin-modern/ Thanks in advance, Hilton

2 1