- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Apr '13

25 Apr '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2013-02-24 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2013-02-24 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-03-19 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-03-19 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Merge and delete
by Tristelune 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hello, I have adopted the package kinskydesktop. But it was an old package and the name of the software has changed. Could you please merge the comments and votes to the package kinsky which is the new one ? Then you can delete the package kinskydesktop. It's the first time I do something like that, just tell me if something is wrong. Thanks!! Tristelune

2 2

[aur-general] Disown request
by Francisco Martinez 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Howdy, The lcs-svn package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lcs-svn/) has been outdated for quite a long time (Since 07/12/12; I flagged it as out-of-date in the AUR yesterday). I sent an email to the maintainer, but I haven't received an answer yet. I'm unsure if I should've waited longer before doing this request, but I am doing it anyway due to the time it has been outdated. Regards, Francisco Martinez

2 1

[aur-general] ta-lib, orphan request
by Denis Kasak 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hello, Please disown ta-lib [1]. The package was last updated a long time ago, it doesn't currently build and the PKGBUILD is ancient. I've sent a mail to the maintainer but it bounced. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ta-lib/ -- Denis Kasak

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2013-02-24 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2013-02-24 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-03-19 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-03-19 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Failure to boot after update yesterday evening (CET)
by Magnus Therning 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus(a)therning.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Tianyi Wang <wty52133(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> There are many bug reports about this issue on https://bugs.archlinux.org >> >> Tbh, before GNOME 3.8 got moved to stable repo, someone posted this bug on >> the mailing list, but it still got moved to stable without any warnings on >> the website. > > Hmm, the one JoKoT3 mentions, > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=161964, doesn't sound like > my issue at all. As I've mentioned a few times now, my system hangs > before I get to GDM. The last thing that appears on the terminal are > a few messages from systemd (nothing about any errors) and then > everything just freezes, no reaction to any key presses at all. It turns out it was the GDM issue. I've now installed and turned on slim, edited my ~/.xinitrc, turned off GDM temporarily, and now everything works fine again. Thanks for all the help! /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus

1 0

[aur-general] Remove request (Deprecated MATE packages)
by Ted Alff 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

3 2

[aur-general] Please merge "mruby" into "mruby-git"
by Anatol Pomozov 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

Hi, according to PKGBUILD guidelines I renamed "mruby" into "mruby-git". The mruby{-git} package is build from git HEAD. Could you please mere votes of mruby into the new mruby-git and remove the old AUR package?

2 1

[aur-general] Failure to boot after update yesterday evening (CET)
by Magnus Therning 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

Hi, I performed a large-ish update yesterday, gnome 3.8, linux kernel and a few other bits and bobs, which left my computer in an unbootable state. I still haven't any more details on why since I've left my other boot option at work. All I see is that the kernel boots and systemd is started but never progresses to a login prompt or GDM. I also don't get any of the virtual terminals. Maybe this is enough for someone to point me in a direction for solving it. If it isn't ill get back with more details this evening when I have some other mean of booting the system. /M

5 8

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * boinc-7.0.65-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cgminer-3.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.65-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cgminer-3.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2013-02-24 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2013-02-24 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-03-19 * fcron-3.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-03-19 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 4 signoffs 2. tomegun - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 1 signoffs 4. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0