- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Dec '12

22 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Dec '12

21 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Suggestions for dealing with packages that require root
by Phillip Smith 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hi all, I'm after some suggestions for how to deal with packages (namely amanda [1]) that require root to build. In this particular instance, amanda needs the user/group that it will run under to be present at compile time. Less than ideal, but that's what upstream gives us. At the moment, I check if the user/group 'amanda' already exist, and if not, create them. This has the side effect that makepkg needs to be run as root if the user/group doesn't exist. I then cleanup (delete) the user/group at the end if I created them. That's messy enough already, but it's been suggested that I use sudo to handle the user add/delete parts to make the PKGBUILD friendlier to AUR helpers. I know helpers needs to work with PKGBUILD's, not PKGBUILD's made to work with helpers, but perhaps there is a middle-ground where we can all eat our cake? ;) I don't want to include sudo as a makedepends since it requires configuration to work properly, nor do I want to make the PKGBUILD "intelligent" to try and auto-detect a privilege escalation tool (sudo or su) which will lead to a bigger mess. Does anyone have a smarter/cleaner/easier way to deal with this scenario? Cheers, ~p [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/am/amanda/PKGBUILD

5 6

[aur-general] Compiling with UTF-8 symbols in build path
by Paul Weingardt 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hello, I just got a comment on my git-cola package, stating that the compilation fails, when the path to the PKGBUILD contains a UTF-8 symbol like the Euro "€" symbol. Example: The PKGBUILD is located under "/home/paul/€uro/". "cd" into that directory and execute makepkg. I am really sure, that this is an upstream problem (I guess it is even an issue in python2-spinx) and I can't solve it. Would someone take a look at it please? Here is the error message: Exception occurred: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/environment.py", line 758, in read_doc pub.set_source(None, src_path.encode(fs_encoding)) UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 25: ordinal not in range(128) Just tryed it out: fs_encoding is "UTF-8" on my machine. And help is appreciated. nobody44

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Compiling emacs lisp files
by Mika Fischer 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hi, I'm currently maintaining the ninja package on the AUR [1]. Recently, there has been an issue about which I'd like to ask for your advice: ninja contains an files for emacs to support edititng the rules files of ninja. A user suggested that I compile the provided .el file to an .elc file. I did that, but then other users complained about the build-dependency on emacs. Now another user suggested that in the PKGBUILD, I should check whether emacs is installed and only then compile the .el file. I'm not totally opposed to this, but it feels a bit strange that the package is different, depending on the system it's built on. What would you do in this situation? Thanks in advance! Best, Mika [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ninja/

5 4

[aur-general] Could anyone help me to adopt 'fossil' package?
by Daniel YC Lin 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

It is outdated for more then one month.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete suckless *-hg packages (suckless.org has moved to git)
by Andreas Wagner 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hello, I have uploaded dmenu-git and and dmc-git to replace dmenu-hg and dmc-hg because suckless.org has moved to git. Could someone here delete the following packages: dmenu-hg dmc-hg Eventually, we should move the rest of the packages over too. Thanks, Andreas

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove (orphaned) pyhyphen and rename python-pysrt
by Veli-Jussi Raitila 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Please remove the pyhyphen package (superceded by python-pyhyphen / python2-pyhyphen) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyhyphen/ Also rename python-pysrt to python2-pysrt https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pysrt/ Thanks! -- BR, VJ

2 3