- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [Removal request] magazynier
by A Rojas 08 Nov '12

08 Nov '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/magazynier/ Doesn't compile anymore, upstream has been inactive for years

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: kdestyle-baghira
by Jekyll Wu 08 Nov '12

08 Nov '12

It is orphaned, and fails to build. The upstream[1] is also dead(as expected). So please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdestyle-baghira/ [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/baghira/files/baghira/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Nov '12

08 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * clanlib-2.3.6-3 (i686) * uqm-0.7.0-3 (i686) * clanlib-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) * uqm-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mcabber-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * uqm-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mcabber-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uqm-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686), since 2012-10-18 * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-18 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 1 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: hts-tvheadend
by Bjoern Franke 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

Hi, please delete hts-tvheadend[1]. It's orphaned and there is also a maintained version: tvheadend[2] regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hts-tvheadend/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tvheadend/ -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] rbutil-svn into rbutil-git
by Maxime Gauduin 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

Hi, RockBox has been using git instead of svn for some time now. Could somebody merge rbutil-svn (orphan) into the new rbutil-git? rbutil-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbutil-svn/ rbutil-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbutil-git/<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbutil-svn/> Thx in advance! PS: Is it still necessary to put links to the packages now that their URLs are fairly predictable? -- Alucryd "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen."

2 1

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 2.0.1
by Lukas Fleischer 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.0.1. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-November/002249.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mcabber-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mcabber-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686), since 2012-10-18 * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-18 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs 2. lfleischer - 2 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request: freenet
by Mike Swanson 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/ The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's request for a systemd service (which was provided in one of the comments too!). In addition, he has another package flagged out-of-date since July.

1 1

[aur-general] Some Doublettes
by Stefan Husmann 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

Hello, these packages provide the same. ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919 typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better name, typerex is not a library Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may change. ndn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn/ ndn2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn2/ Orphaned, dupe of ndn ndn-beta https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn-beta/ Orphaned, upstream obviously only provides stable releases Best Regards Stefan

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc into stepmania
by Devin J. Pohly 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

Hi there, Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/ The sm-ssc fork is now the official code for StepMania [3], and the sm-ssc package itself is both orphaned and outdated. The previous maintainer (Artefact2) posted a comment there directing users to use stepmania instead. [3]: http://www.stepmania.com/wiki/Download_StepMania_Source_Code Thanks, *dp

2 1