- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andrea - 2 signoffs 2. tpowa - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request for servicemenu-pdf-kde4
by Krzysztof Raczkowski 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hi, I'd like to ask for merging: servicemenu-pdf-kde4 [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24898] with: kde-servicemenus-pdf [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60976] in regard of the new KDE package guidelines. Cheers, -- Krzysztof Raczkowski raczkow(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by A Rojas 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Please merge rootactions-servicemenu-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20085 into kde-servicemenus-rootactions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60978 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] "qxmpp" package is obsolete
by Le Guen Yannick 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hi, A month ago, I added a comment and then emailed /csgeek/, the maintainer of "qxmpp" AUR package, in order to keep the package up-to-date. Unfortunately, I didn't get any answer, and his package is stuck at version 0.3, whereas the latest upstream version is 0.5. Can someone declare "qxmpp" package as orphaned ? Thanks !

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * directfb-1.6.1-1 (i686) * electricsheep-2.7b33-3 (i686) * qingy-1.0.0-5 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-3 (i686) * wxgtk2.9-2.9.4-1 (i686) * directfb-1.6.1-1 (x86_64) * electricsheep-2.7b33-3 (x86_64) * qingy-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-3 (x86_64) * wxgtk2.9-2.9.4-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * directfb-1.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wxgtk2.9-2.9.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wxgtk2.9-2.9.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 6 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 5 signoffs 3. andrea - 4 signoffs 4. tpowa - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request of krunner-firefoxbookmarks
by Tilo 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48405 it is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60938 Regards Tilo

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by TingPing 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

hexchat-sasl should be removed, it was added upstream

2 1

[aur-general] KDE Package Guidelines (aka AUR plasmoids mess)
by Andrea Scarpino 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi all, I just received a mail where the user ask me to rename a plasmoid package in AUR. He suggests to rename it as kdeplasma-addons-applets-$plasmoidname, but this is obviously wrong as kdeplasma-addons is the name of the *official* KDE package. If we would rename all our packages in that way, will be really difficult, for both users and maintainer, to understand if we are talking about an official kde plasmoid or not. So, I thought about two naming conventions: * kdeplasma-applets-$plasmoidname * plasma-applets-$plasmoidname Sincerely, I prefer the first one as all kde packages start with the kde prefix. I also wrote a simple KDE package guidelines page[1] taking this opportunity. Any suggestion is much appreciated. The absence of this naming convention created many duplicates on AUR, so let's start the AUR plasmoid cleanup! Thanks! [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/KDE_Package_Guidelines -- Andrea

4 5

[aur-general] Merge request for krunner-chromiumbookmarks
by Zom Aur 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi, Could someone merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45643 with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60927 in regard of the KDE package guidelines? Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Removing old named package: kdeplasma-playwolf-elements
by Splash 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Please could you remove kdeplasma-playwolf-elements now that I've already upload kdeplasma-applets-playwolf-elements following the new KDE package guidelines. Thanks

2 2