- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [merge] djvu2pdf-latest
by Anton Larionov 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Please, merge djvu2pdf-latest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57014 into djvu2pdf https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397 -- Regards, Anton Larionov

3 2

[aur-general] [Merge Request] mmm-mode
by Stefan Husmann 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, please merge mmm-mode[1] into emacs-mmm-mode[2]. The latter was introduced for better naming consistence. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15223 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58477 Best Regards Stefan

3 2

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 14/04/12 11:02 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 14.04.2012 10:23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: >>> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>>> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support. >>> There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not the >>> previous), but they point to mail from mailman. >>> >>> Do you get digests instead of separate mails? >> True, I've checked mailman interface and it seems to be problem with my >> mail client. No, I get separated mails. > I meant if Connor gets digest, sorry for being unclear there. Yes, I switched all my lists to digest mode awhile ago when I was spending more and more time deleting emails. Do you feel strongly that I should switch back?

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge deepin-scrot-git into deepin-screenshot-git
by Jekyll Wu 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The maintainer has created deepin-screenshot-git[1] to replace deepin-scrot-git[2], which follows the renaming of the upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57793 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55299 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPiOpUAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAd60P/0xmUF6MT924UPxS9Vouu1Kc zrR2AI2v6akCjSe3KHi7fWtLlv7z3ugFHflhgEsRhdsaU3ehOHj2OLnd4ytMLCjM RC1W/ILIJ/o/cCAt8F1XLkRO5/hxgTbfPu9hm0DYpY5TfCJk2jDIXGF8QYNd3hUv QIsMHBfH8duZV63bgGaSAH8MaKQTcAVPPkjRzPwbh/Q3KW5MzzARY1OqbzShvBRp Im1/l/MaGzOW6P9hVOGVZeQaJKwPaxKuNMiEvsLd5liRu34sTabvpMGeBHNq0DrO D7bCGjl//ABmh+D7w4a4r+cb3uLsJaZr7N6AuPQPnIFVXOBEpU9ceAFJ/LB5C6Ub z08XR7khXcaY/bJPsDVRH+x3iejP5jaH+itCnrBVg/XAe6ignQb7fGqvnVgHt4W3 QuvwY0c4DJg8sip+SsrKtxHxSlWoMlBb+hUuuZFRBirnPE6cjn8KzvJvggMaWFtR gTSiDy5jJY1KkVfSrextJBGD2W5tAK82WZpC1cRdWT0c7Gq3bn+hhUFaSRbUPdyt 9Yepvz7nvbC4PZ9XpYvNIdAn/eyodyUskt7kHZUbdtn81WAZibgJThx7UKTbmVx6 zZ1ZY3pAwYCM6qC/0HZWTdEWU7dIKow7Ph8FpIc7HhxgObZDYGm9zeYU9QCfWr/G NpT+IsBLB3pomsM29iW9 =zR72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 13/04/12 04:16 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae: >> On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote: >>> How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who >>> uploaded the key fingerprint to >>> http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and >>> http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he >>> wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not >>> think less of him for being too absent-minded to sign emails! >> Hmm... barely acceptable, but we will let you away with it this time. >> >> Anyway, I recognize your name and have no bad connotations with it, >> which is the only criterion I use for reviewing applications. >> >> So, good luck! >> >> Allan > All looks pretty clean to me, i would do one suggestion > start using the package function, i just checked some pkgbuilds randomly and > did not see it in any of them. (this is not at all life threatening ;p) > and you can remove the '|| return 1' since makepkg catches this nicely for > some time now > > Very true. I just updated 10 of my PKGBUILDs to make them not look like they were written 3 years ago. Will do more soon.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 61 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (55 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stativ - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR
by SanskritFritz 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems to be active. Thanks SanskritFritz

2 3

[aur-general] duplicate aur packages
by Daniel Wallace 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

this was just created Linuxtycoon - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58404 which is just a copy of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58139 but uses the deb package for some reason

2 1

[aur-general] tu bylaws update proposal
by Ike Devolder 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an update to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be gpg signed with the addidional publication of the public key. This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_ne… attached the patch for https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html --Ike

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion requests: firefox*
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

2 1