- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. ibiru - 5 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by rafael ff1 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

speex replaced SVN repo by GIT repo. Therefore, I uploaded speex-git to replace speex-svn. Please delete speex-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17012) Thanks, Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment request
by rafael ff1 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him because his email's domain doesn't exist. Please disown this package so I can adopt and fix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11397 Thanks, Rafael ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> Date: 2012/2/27 Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: rafael.f.f1(a)gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: rmbl(a)openspeak-project.org Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- <mail header snip> Hi there, You're the maintainer of portaudio-svn [1], right? I posted some comments in AUR interface, with suggestions for the PKGBUILD, but I'm not sure you received it. Can you please take a look? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11397 Thanks, Rafael

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request - garden-of-coloured-lights
by Ольга 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

Package garden-of-coloured-lights (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44913) should be removed as duplicate of garden (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22178) Last one is of the same version but have more dependencies, votes, more reliable name and more up-to-date link to website.

2 1

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: sqlplus11
by Jason St. John 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

sqlplus11[1] should be deleted because the submitter of the package basically admitted that sqlplus11 was a duplicate of instantclient-sqlplus[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36198 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 Thanks! ______________________________________________ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lfleischer - 2 signoffs 2. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]
by eagletmt 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

> As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to > add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD. Most PKGBUILDs specify -i/--install-dir and -n/--bindir. So there is no need to add --no-user-install, isn't it?

2 2

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared
by Jason St. John 25 Feb '12

25 Feb '12

perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides the same functionality[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536 [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=… Thanks! ______________________________________________ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Feb '12

25 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: vte-svn
by Jekyll Wu 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The upstream has moved to git[1], so this package[2] should be removed now. [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20846 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPR+NQAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAsAAQAJg/xmOQ0Fy8mDp8B+4308V4 JxhxhijnnuLchPftUZI8CLTr7i1LHxKzxPA69eU5U+pezBIzcO65RTjeo1oeaQmA +XmPeGW2Q1/xtjhxc/bJVYlRDLdO9E1G6Egb4f/qh+rouc2JZcjZKrnUdbth0wv1 ur1FKDx45A3uGzdovLk5N/64SBN8ebzQ/RpLhx3NPw7yavPZbJbyp2bWNMcI+uhH dbdvNNJD8J8LCAWBXLMulFmAQzaDcyzCy6yBQbdRmfARmvOtvi5dGUM3IUBGRbG5 bcqPUiUNlXSIvIMth7jpywDTPpUeVpvYHJMUuFdjgRRm85cZKmeYn8FwpnH5ClPz JZHXE7NyS7NV0P0ggDlmdhRinidmc1QSadxiAB7jG24/Erk0aVs0rQtxvShlFHeC Fu0KcI3U1MV/j0RnFfRICgGM1wR9VTzTE8T0hjS7K+2MUAk+ztToBKT45UCYS/do sthox6IbJ2cQdPL2G6+iHuGJThs+etZ1lmm+AUs0kUmlMuYRBPm4eRYnBKPYJh/O 0ADe9bNOQfLtwiUSj+iATIuF3NaUeCHab1VjmgwHZBlN8GGj2Jcz9BFLs+xSmFLQ ymKzSBETfGzwAX3sHEJkN+eUHyJk35tnDxtJS1VbFTH3Ppp89LofObmb1CLx+NCW 7eZhTeKFS4kvjkJMZNT9 =ydPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1