- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Remove `ulex`
by Sergei Lebedev 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Hello, Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to `ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]? Thanks, Sergei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55537 [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OCaml_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Hello guys, I have an aur package (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: * libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ * xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests. Kind regards, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes - duca

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
by Stéphane Gaudreault 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Mplayer2 was very promising last year when they forked from the original mplayer project. One of the main goal of this project was to provide more frequent release and updates. Unfortunatly, they failled to provide something else after the initial release. This initial release no longer build with current tools/libs and contain several major bugs. A workaround was to update our pkg to a recent git snapshot. Since then, I do not see any reason to continue to update this package which is currently broken. If there is no objection, I will drop the package from [community]. Users should consider to follow mplayer2-git from AUR or the original mplayer from [extra]. Cheers, Stéphane

4 5

[aur-general] Forgotten AUR User Login Name
by Java Script 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Hello. I'm at a loss as to logging into the AUR. I've forgotten the user-name tied to my account. Could someone please confirm my AUR user-name at the same email registered to this mailing list?

2 1

[aur-general] forgot username linked to e-mail
by jfg4444＠yahoo.ca 03 Jan '12

03 Jan '12

Would you help me get back AUR user account, of which I've lost my username? Its address is jfg4444(a)yahoo.ca Thanks in advance!

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 03 Jan '12

03 Jan '12

lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008 Please delete

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Max Roder 03 Jan '12

03 Jan '12

Hi, please remove html-mason [1], as it's just a (0-votes) copy of perl-html-mason (out of date, in addition). Max [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33124

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Jan '12

03 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any) * fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686) * gpac-3824-1 (i686) * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686) * fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) * gpac-3824-1 (x86_64) * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] about non-updated packages
by Massimiliano Torromeo 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Paolo Stivanin <paolostivanin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You was at version 1.1.X and a lot of version have come after that! You are wrong sir. dropbox-experimental was at 1.3.4 and version 1.3.5 was released only a week ago. https://github.com/mtorromeo/archlinux-packages/commits/master/dropbox-expe…

1 0