- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Dec '11

19 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.14.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.14.2-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686), since 2011-11-27 * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64), since 2011-11-27 * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs 3. andrea - 2 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] removal request (qtd-svn)
by Gour 19 Dec '11

19 Dec '11

Hello, qtd-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25827) is obsolete since qtd project is now at bitbucket and there is newer qtd-hg package. Sincerely, Gour -- A self-realized man has no purpose to fulfill in the discharge of his prescribed duties, nor has he any reason not to perform such work. Nor has he any need to depend on any other living being. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810

2 1

[aur-general] removal and orphaning request
by Stefan Wilkens 19 Dec '11

19 Dec '11

Hello again, Please remove zsnes-wip link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2029 reason: project no longer under development, package is massively outdated, newer AUR entry is available here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24361. Keeping a 4 year old wip package seems silly. Please orphan gpar2 link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3696 reason: I've flagged the package out-of-date 18 sept, emailed the maintainer 21 nov (no reply) and I have a simple fix to keep the application functional. This is something I use quite a bit, I'd like to update and maintain it.

2 1

[aur-general] removal request - nvtv
by Stefan Wilkens 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

Please remove. name: nvtv aur link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4234 reason: no changes since 2006, no longer workable with latest xserver, segfaults on latest nvidia driver, no patches available. thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by David Adler 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

Please delete my package denemo-sinsmf. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40705 No file conflict anymore when attempting to install both libsmf and denemo, thus it is now obsolete. thanks

2 1

[aur-general] ATi driver DKMS package - what to include
by Linux Lover 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

Hi guys, I am trying to resuscitate the dkms-fglrx package [1]. I am wondering what I should leave in (the ATi Linux installer comes with a lot of binary stuff). I checked the catalyst PKGBUILD in the AUR, while it copies a lot of libraries, it does not seem to copy e.g. stuff like AMD's XvBA libraries and the fgl_glxgears fglrxinfo binaries (which I think can be handy to be distributed with the driver). Any pointers as to what can, has to, or should not be included? Cheers Stijn [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11661

3 3

[aur-general] Cross-compilers naming scheme
by Bartłomiej Piotrowski 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

If someone hasn't spot it yet, we have mess with naming of cross-compilers in [community]. Currently there are 3 schemes: 1) $appname-$platform (gcc-avr and binutils-avr) The only problem I see is mingw32 (and related packages). While {gcc,binutils}-mingw32 looks fine, I don't know what to do with mingw32-pthreads, mingw32-runtime and mingw32-w32api. 2) $platform-$appname (mingw32 packages) My favorite. Seems to be most readable (IMHO) and can be easily applied to every cross-compiler. 3) cross-$platform-$appname Probably as good as second option, but cross prefix is annoying me. I've already discussed it with Alexander Rødseth, but Arch isn't a project for a few people. What do you think? Which option is the best one? -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

4 5

[aur-general] removal request - monitorix-tmpfs
by member graysky 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

Please delete this entry: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34134 I have uploaded its successor called, monitorix-sync-daemon. Having both is just confusing. Thx!

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.14.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.14.2-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686), since 2011-11-27 * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64), since 2011-11-27 * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 2. ibiru - 2 signoffs 3. seblu - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Lost username on AUR
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 18 Dec '11

18 Dec '11

Hi everybody, I've got a problem with AUR login. I can't remember my username and as far as I can see there's only the "Forgotten password" form. Is there any way to know my old username? If the answer is "no", is there a way to delete the old account and make a new one with the same mail address? Thanks, have a nice day/night/everythingelse.

6 8