- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [Delete Request] firefox-spell-pt-br
by Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Please, remove the firefox-spell-pt-br http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7772 With the hunspell-pt-br, the firefox-spell-pt-br it isn't necessary. -- Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto Robinho robsonpeixoto(a)gmail.com Computer Science Master's degree student, University of Campinas Arch Linux Brasil Developer - http://archlinux-br.org Linux Counter #395633 IRC: robsonpeixoto Twitter: http://twitter.com/rrspba github: https://github.com/robsonpeixoto

2 2

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"
by Christian Scharkus 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

I didn't have a look at the packages and so I don't know wether they are apps or leibs but in Carsten of leibs the naming pattern java-* should be prefered imho (debian-like) Greetings Christian Scharkus Am 04.11.2010 09:17 schrieb "Stefan Husmann" <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de>: Am 04.11.2010 08:46, schrieb Stefan J. Betz: > Good Morning, > > hudson and java-hudson are the same Package. Can anyone please remove > java-hu... Hello, the same is true for http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31630 and http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32080 (nexus and java-nexus). Same maintainers as with hudson and java hudson here, btw. I deleted the "out of date" ones. Stefan

1 1

[aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"
by Stefan J. Betz 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Good Morning, hudson and java-hudson are the same Package. Can anyone please remove java-hudson? Greetings Betz Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete Request] pygoogle
by notizblock 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi, pygoogle[1] is dead: „Unfortunately, Google no longer supports the SOAP API for search, nor do they provide new license keys. In a nutshell, PyGoogle is pretty much dead at this point“[2]. The current version was released on 2004-02-26 [3]. I maintained it, because it had been a dependency for w3af until now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26050 [2] http://pygoogle.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://sourceforge.net/projects/pygoogle/ regards, Florian -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request
by Peter Lewis 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi Alexander, On Wednesday 03 November 2010 09:58:38 Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Could you orphan maniadrive > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344) It has not been updated > since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer does not respond to emails. > Thanks in advance. This guy has a lot of packages, none of which have been updated in the last couple of years, from what I can see (and most flagged out of date too). How long did you leave it after emailing him? I orphaned this one, but will these all not be caught in the bulk orphaning thing we agreed recently? (Has that happened yet?) Cheers, Pete.

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Alexander Rødseth 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi, Could you orphan maniadrive (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344) It has not been updated since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer does not respond to emails. Thanks in advance. - Alexander Rødseth

1 0

[aur-general] Delete / Orphan request
by kevku 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi Req to orphan following packages, emailed maintainer no reply so far. libp11 libxml-security-c xsd libdigidoc-svn libdigidocpp-svn qdigidoc-svn qesteidutil-svn smartcardpp-svn and deletion of following packages due to renaming and structure changes in the software opensc-esteid firefox-esteid-svn Extra information: Official goverment backed version: https://installer.id.ee/manualinstall_eng.htm Community fork: http://code.google.com/p/esteid/

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Xavier D. 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, Could you orphan pjproject (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12848) as it's no more updated by the maintainer and he doesn't respond to emails. Thanks in advance. BRs

2 1

[aur-general] aur website default ssl
by Ionuț Bîru 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works as expected. Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur development -- Ionuț

15 27

[aur-general] [google-talkplugin] How to build an older version of openssl
by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hello, guys. Google Talk Plugin for GMail is not working anymore for me (and others...) because it relies on libssl.so.0.9.8. But for my surprise, the binary GoogletalkPlugin is a 32 bits executable, even for the 64 bits package. It comes right after the original deb package, provided by Google. To make things short, I tried to "downgrade" the lib32-openssl PKGBUILD to version 0,9,8n. It compiles fine, but the resulting libraries (libcrypto.so.0.9.8 and libssl.so.0.9,8) are ELF64, when they should be ELF32. You can view the PKGBUILD in http://pastebin.com/04xsippr So, should I need a 32 bits chroot for that? Shouldn't the multilib compiler be enough? -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------

2 10