- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] libao 1.0 rebuild list
by Andrea Scarpino 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

On Saturday 10 April 2010 23:05:15 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi DEVs and TUs, > I am uploading libao 1.0.0 in [testing] now. > > There is a soname bump, so I created a (small) rebuild list for [extra] and > [community] packages. > > Thanks Well, I built some packages and they are in my staging dir, but I cannot release them due to repolock issue. Now I am going out, if you want you can build libao yourself; commit are in trunk. CCin' aur-general -- Andrea | deelab.org/bash

1 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: renpy
by Franz Rogar 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

Hello, Package "renpy" [1] has been outdated since three months ago when version 6.10.2 was released. It's marked as "out-of-date" and have some comments supplying fixes and alternative updated PKBGUILDs (which suffers from same problems I'll point later) but there're no signs of maintenance. PKGBUILD has also some other major problems that should be fixed: - It doesn't support x86_64. It needs lib32 dependencies which are not indicated. - It doesn't rely on pygame (or python-game) at all, so it should be removed. - It relies on java-runtime and zenity (for folder selection), which are unset. - Etc. I contacted mantainer via e-mail but have got no answer from him. Therefore, I request if package renpy [1] could be orphaned so other user/dev can take care of it. I can take it over as I'm currently mantaining renpy64 (renpy with support for "pure" Arch64). [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23983 -- Thanks in anyway, Franz Rogar

2 1

[aur-general] community-testing repo cleanout
by Andrea Scarpino 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

[quote="Allan"] Now the big rebuild is moved, it is a good time to clean out the rest of [community-testing]. Here is a semi-annotated package list: [/quote] bzrtools 2.2.0-1 just an update? cgmail 0.6.1-1 just an update? choqok 0.9.55-1 beta testing cinelerra-cv 20100405-1 just an update? geos 3.2.1-1 just an update? libsquish 1.10-1 old, in testing since September lomoco 1.0-5 old pessulus 2.30.0-1 just an update? python-configobj 4.7.2-2 testing arch 'any' tinyxml 2.5.3-4 old, in testing since October uriparser 0.7.5-1 just an update? -- Andrea | deelab.org/bash

3 4

[aur-general] Orphan request: brother-mfc210c-fixed-version
by Sven Schneider 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

Hi, the package "brother-mfc210c-fixed-version" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19795) does not seem to be taken care of by he current maintainer. Can someone orphan this package please, so that another maintainer can take it over. Thanks Sven

2 1

[aur-general] [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR?
by Evangelos Foutras 09 Apr '10

09 Apr '10

Please start threads regarding [community] packages on aur-general so that other TUs can respond. I didn't notice I was replying to arch-dev-public and got my message bounced. :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR? To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public(a)archlinux.org> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) <ghost1227(a)archlinux.us> wrote: > I'm currently maintaining raggle, which has been abandoned > upstream for some time. The recent rebuild of ruby broke it > horribly and thus far I have been unable to patch it in > such a way that it functions as expected. I hate to remove > this package as it seems to be quite popular, but given > its condition and upstream status, I think removal to AUR > is best unless someone else can provide a working patch. > Thoughts? > -- It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats. I'd say drop it. :)

3 2

[aur-general] PKGBUILD removal gnome-format
by Michael Kanis 09 Apr '10

09 Apr '10

Hi, could you please remove the PKGBUILD for gnome-format[1]? I'm the author of the software but I don't maintain it anymore (in favor of gnome-disk-utility) and it doesn't build anymore with newer vala versions. Thanks Michael [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22921

2 1

[aur-general] Orphaning hibernate-script
by Thomas Bächler 09 Apr '10

09 Apr '10

Its been a while since I actively maintained hibernate-script, and I don't use it anymore. I am orphaning it right now - if a dev or TU wants it, it's free for grabs.

1 0

[aur-general] at your service...
by Martti Kühne 09 Apr '10

09 Apr '10

hey just wanted to say, some are going some are arriving. if there are pkgs you think I should take care of, tell me, let me adopt. I'm glad to help at the right spot. Unless the upstream pkg is totally obscure I can handle it and even patch if necessary. Write me. mar77i

2 1

[aur-general] renpy native x86_64 support problem
by Franz Rogar 08 Apr '10

08 Apr '10

Hello, I've a problem with current renpy and I don't know what can I do. My problem is this: - AUR renpy doesn't support pure x86_64 system, even thought PKGBUILD says it does. So, I built from sources a native version which "adds" support for x86_64 and, consecuently, new problems arised: - PKGBUILD can't be built but as root - Because you need to source a new environment, python image support lacks some formats (I don't know why but it does) and, therefore, renpy fails to start. The funny thing is that if you build it in a terminal command by command, it builds perfectly and without any error at all. So, I'm on a dilemma: - If I release the PKGBUILD, it will be useless. - I can create a new PKGBUILD which grab precompiled x86_64 runtime files (basically just .so files about ~5MB I think, haven't checked) and applies patches as needed. - I can release a full binary version (which I dislike). - I can't find any other solution. I'd pick for second option up, but AUR doesn't support binary and I don't have a hosting to host it. Does anyone could give me any suggestion on what to do? -- Thanks in anyway, Franz Rogar

2 1

[aur-general] delete package unicap
by Jordi Cerdan 08 Apr '10

08 Apr '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, I'm the maintainer of the unicap package ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10029 ). This one have been replaced by 3 other packages libunicap, libucil and libunicapgtk I have already uploaded those 3 new packages and now, after 2/3 months, I think unicap package can be removed. Could someone do this? Kind regards, - -- Jordi Cerdan http://www.jordicerdan.com Andorra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAku9wfwACgkQI1eRLmOdtQRSyACfclyOQbSK7uLUP4ZoAw8fzu8A qKsAnjHe2M8ITZ1gQx26Tf0hWB3SV2A1 =X6dP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2