- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] packages up for adoption..
by M Rawash 04 Sep '09

04 Sep '09

4 7

[aur-general] package deletion request (mrxvtutf8-svn)
by M Rawash 04 Sep '09

04 Sep '09

please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25149 i'm re-submitting it under a different name.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request of malaga-suomi and openoffice-voikko
by Jussi Timperi 03 Sep '09

03 Sep '09

Hello, Couple of packages can be removed: openoffice-voikko: Obsolete, replaced by openoffice.org-voikko malaga-suomi: Obsolete, replaced by suomi-malaga Thank You.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Perry 03 Sep '09

03 Sep '09

Hello, could someone remove these packages: ati-dri-r6xx-r7xx: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28982 i renamed it to ati-dri-git xf86-video-radeonhd-git-r6xx-r7xx: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24236 it was merged to master branch a long time ago ;-) Perry

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal ( alfresco-labs-tomcat )
by Tom 02 Sep '09

02 Sep '09

Hi, Alfresco Labs was renamed to Alfresco Community, so I uploaded a new PKGBUILD to AUR. Please remove alfresco-labs-tomcat: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22387 Thanks. Bye.

2 1

[aur-general] Chromium builds and runs on Pentium-m, but not on Desktop (Athlon 2800+)
by Bernard Mentink 30 Aug '09

30 Aug '09

I have successfully compiled/installed and run the chromium-continuous from AUR repository on my pentium-m based laptop. However, when doing a similar install on my desktop which has Athlon 2800+ CPU the build is fine, but I get an error on running it, the error is: Code: $ chromium-browser [7215:7215:9111919603:ERROR:/b/slave/chromium-rel-linux/build/src/chrome/browser/google_update_settings_posix.cc(73)] Not implemented reached in static bool GoogleUpdateSettings::GetLanguage(std::wstring*) /usr/bin/chromium-browser: line 4: 7215 Illegal instruction ./chrome --enable-plugins "$@" I have even tried installing the package built on the laptop (i.e the one that works) and running on the desktop, but still the same error. Anyone have a clue what is going on? I can't tell from the error .. Thanks, Bernie

8 17

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Lukáš Jirkovský 30 Aug '09

30 Aug '09

Hello, could someone remove these packages: these are replaced by enblend-hg: enblend-staging-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26292 enblend-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16326 this is replaced by exult-svn and is already an orphan: exult-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14956 I think this can also be removed, luxrender switched to mercurial some time ago, but I'm not maintainer of this package: luxrender-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15119 Thanks, Lukáš

2 2

[aur-general] Integrity Check i686 of community 28-08-2009
by Xavier 28 Aug '09

28 Aug '09

===================================== = Integrity Check i686 of community = ===================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Duplicate PKGBUILDs --------------------- /var/abs/extra/happy vs. /var/abs/community/happy /var/abs/extra/haskell-utf8-string vs. /var/abs/community/haskell-utf8-string /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-ar /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-ca /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-cs /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-da /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-el /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-et /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-fi /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-he /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-hu /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-lt /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-nb /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-nn /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-pl /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-ru /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-sh /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-sk /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-sr /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-tr /var/abs/extra/openoffice-i18n vs. /var/abs/community/openoffice-uk /var/abs/extra/php-fileinfo vs. /var/abs/community/php-fileinfo /var/abs/extra/squirrelmail vs. /var/abs/community/squirrelmail Missing Dependencies ---------------------- eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' flumotion --> 'gstreamer0.10-libpng' flumotion --> 'gstreamer0.10-vorbis' flumotion --> 'gstreamer0.10-theora' flumotion --> 'gstreamer0.10-ogg' twisted-words --> 'twisted-web' kungfu --> 'gstreamer0.10-dvdread' kungfu --> 'gstreamer0.10-mpeg2dec' kungfu --> 'gstreamer0.10-libpng' kungfu --> 'gstreamer0.10-theora' ftpmonitor --> 'kdebase' kpacman --> 'kdegames' moovida --> 'python-cssutils' syncekonnector --> 'kdepim' Missing Makedepends --------------------- id3lib-rcc --> 'gcc34' greycstoration --> 'gcc34' pandoc --> 'haskell-zip-archive' tvision --> 'gcc34' classpath --> 'jikes' Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 23 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 19 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0

2 3

[aur-general] Duplicate package: lua-expat
by Pierre Chapuis 28 Aug '09

28 Aug '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21939 (lua-expat) is a duplicate of http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13509 (luaexpat) and should be removed. -- catwell

2 2

[aur-general] AUR package updating enhancements
by Nélson «VuDu» Cunha 27 Aug '09

27 Aug '09

Hello, following the weird titled "AUR webpage" thread ( http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/thread.html#5602 ) I think the way maintainers handle their packages could have some things simplified. I agree that simple updates to PKGBUILDs should be easier. I've seen many packages with typos in PKGBUILDs, showing that the extra workload of having to archive the files and upload them doesn't necessary make users test things before uploading. That's all up to the maintainer's will to do things right. I think having a simple syntax highlighted code editor to quick edit the PKGBUILD or at least a way to simply update the PKGBUILD without having to archive and upload everything every time would be a great help. Some alternatives google gave me, dunno if there are any better: http://alexgorbatchev.com/wiki/SyntaxHighlighter http://codepress.sourceforge.net/ http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/ http://helene.muze.nl/ What do you think?

9 14