- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] Makefile possibly removed libc?
by vattan 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:04:58 +0200 > From: J?rgen Werner <jotz.csp(a)web.de> > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general(a)archlinux.org> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Makefile possibly removed libc? > Message-ID: <55F2A74A.7030105(a)web.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > > Thanks guys, but pacman -qk sublime-text and glibc both listed a pile of > > files and said nothing was missing. Normally when I screw up this bad id > > uninstall/reinstall but I will not have net access on this machine for > another two weeks so its sneaker net for me. any other ideas? > > Hi Vattan, > unless you ran sublime as root it could have not damaged anything system > relevant. Usually if I run out of disc space, I made the observation, > that either my home or the /tmp directory is screwed up. Try to > delete/rename the .sublime folder in your home. Also, if your /tmp > directory is not in RAM, clean it. > If neither helps, try starting sublime as a different user (with clean > home directory). > Good luck! > Renaaming the folder found in ~/.config let it launch! All the uncommented lines in the makefile I am blaming are as follows: SHELL = /bin/sh PREFIX = ./BUILDS TARGET = coil_inducer CC = gcc CFLAGS = -02 clean: rm -f *.o rm -f coil rm -f tables I had commented out the workings of that makefile in an attempt to learn how it works, and added some of the earlier lines, but accidently did not comment out the last 4. I don't know why it would modify my settings but? So now sublime is working, but I want all my old tweaks back, wish me luck in recovering them.

1 0

[arch-general] dbus-daemon : high cpu load on resume
by SET 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

Hello, Since yesterday's update, after resume from suspend, dbus-daemon eats up all cpu cores and load average quickly increases. Got this on two machines using KDE5. Arch related ? Upstream ? Any hint to resolve that ? Thanks.

1 1

Re: [arch-general] [Solved] Re: PKGBUILD ERROR
by Ralf Mardorf 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:02:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:32:59 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: >>As Ralf said, nothing *requires* yaourt, and indeed some things will >>blow up when you try installling via yaourt -- but standard makepkg >>handles fine, and indeed so do most AUR wrappers, in the AUR Helpers >>comparison chart [1] see the "Clean build" entry for yaourt. ;) [2] > >FWIW I'm using yaourt and usually it doesn't fail. There's just one >issue I encounter from time to time, but that also happens when using >makepkg. By default I set up makepkg to build in tmpfs and it >sometimes is too small. One time building a kernel failed, but usually >building default Arch kernels works with around 2 GiB tmpfs. If I build >a bloated web browser, such as e.g. firefox, the around 2 GiB tmpfs >don't provide the needed space. IMO building in tmpfs isn't really >faster, but I like it, because I don't need to tidy up tmpfs ;). Btw. >makepkg is set up to save the packages not in the tmpfs, but in a cache >to archive packages. My apologies. Just for fun I read the "Clean build" entry. That's correct! The setting to build in tmpfs is for yaourt, I just tend to run makepkg in tmpfs too. However, indeed, if it fails I build outside tmpfs using makepkg.

2 2

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] Arch general mailing list
by Florian Pritz 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:48:39 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com> wrote: > 2 mails I send to Arch general more then 12 hours ago didn't come > through the list. I received no postmaster, no mailman and no moderator > message. For testing purpose I resend one of those two mails a few > minutes ago and it also didn't come through. Please send me a list of Message-IDs of the mails that are missing so I have something to look for. In most clients you should be able to view the message source (Thunderbird and at least my claws-mail have it bound to crtl+u) and then look for the Message-ID header. Also for kicks I'm sending this to arch-general myself. Let's see if it works. Florian

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [Solved] Re: PKGBUILD ERROR
by Ralf Mardorf 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:02:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >Btw. makepkg is set up to save the packages not in the tmpfs, but in a >cache to archive packages. Again apologies. I meant that I set up my makepkg.conf to save packages in a cache.

1 0

[arch-general] Fw: important
by 888poker 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

Hello! Important message, visit http://instalacje-bialystok.pl/once.php?fx2 888poker

1 0

[arch-general] Fw: important
by juergen＠hoetzel.info 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

Hello! Important message, visit http://obogowie.pl/future.php?jb juergen(a)hoetzel.info

1 0

[arch-general] gpg-agent
by edson duarte 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 hi! for some time now, gpg-agent complains about "--write-env-file" being an obsolete option, but in the wiki[1] still says to configure ~/.bash_profile using this option. i don't really know how gpg-agent works so, someone knows how to correctly configure it? [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GnuPG#gpg-agent thanks, - -- edson duarte https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV8jsDAAoJEEuaWOJw2A3LrMkP/12Zq+AJXIilcBVu9LfalXN7 U4sjG5HsXM36V6LsGxBiyipP7LunX/N1M7hMWMm15+UohbYBihwIm4y3UibF3d2S ttRiHu/nZermcXrdf8IUvo8WImXRn3uT5N8NRM7hYFUS2HHdQ8b8zKMppn48pGFl RcuEsqv8wf+YikjBp0B75nt0ArIvH4r38CLPg/T/Xu/uD59Sq166XkeBcoZUWSdQ 8Kd/vqFEdMSlIohU+ujGOtC+YhVoDFs0MJKKCQDlL4iRmT8e9wLD7/7oqdoL1f3Z 3rITi9Z2LJW+Kzq/0CxPiz2afF4inVp1y+WfRuEJpPy/ooW1N01f09IGVesGr3L6 TuqHXiAitU1dPlcWNEnvQguvG+tg9Coenacgitir+I8wBWclfXq6igQHxNc1HTGK IZxmr70iBALlXDm5BzE+cliheEslC6dx/CWsBn0QYaPM1XpGYTnbZ5tSQ1RqC+iV OCUTdCpU5SKpKXwd8QW55e1Ofzndid053GYSUnEQ5IkNGX29//hvQBme4j3XWTQI W0yxQXb/slWvomEpfuci9rJ3587bTPxnUUsdHYT7MJ8SFRFNhSKUa59yMMU2d3q1 GW8OnF6UYqsDYbwrcfoDD2MvKi+ZTfbbKHZOYiGyJZowL5MV06m6VSBQHIhh3goJ 5e+1ED4zH3YxckZb5rgX =gEVz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

[arch-general] PKGBUILD ERROR
by mudongliang 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

I got the following errors in "yaourt -S sublime-text-dev" : sublime-text-dev 3.3083-2 (2015-07-07 21:14) ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) ==> ------------------------------------ ==> y Please add $VISUAL to your environment variables for example: export VISUAL="vim" (in ~/.bashrc) (replace vim with your favorite editor) ==> Edit PKGBUILD with: vim ==> ERROR: Running makepkg as root is not allowed as it can cause permanent, catastrophic damage to your system. Unable to read PKGBUILD Waiting for help.Thank you all! - mudongliang

6 14

[arch-general] Makefile possibly removed libc?
by vattan 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

So I am trying to learn about c programming and I was editing a simple c program I got off the web. I was modifing the makefile to understand what it does and after building it from inside sublimetext 2 I noticed that my root directory had zero free space. I rebooted and had 2 gigs free again, but now when I try to launch sublime text I get a segfault. Dmesg reports an error 4 in libc-2.21.so I have not had any internet connection on this machine for 2 months so I know it wasn't update related. My key suspect is the last few line of the make file which I thought I had commented out but actually missed and read: Clean: rm -f *.so rm -f coil rm -f tables When I built it from the terminal in its directory it may have been fine, but when I built it thru sublime I suspect the path was different in some way and it deleted files it shouldn't have. Can anyone help me out here? Sublime is what this pc is for and I am kind of hosed! Can I just rebuild some library? Is my suspicion misplaced and you need more info? Is there a way to see what files have been deleted in the last 24 hours dispite a reboot?/ Thanks!

5 4