- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] Pulseaudio doesn't see the correct sound card.
by "Jérôme M. Berger" 28 Mar '10

28 Mar '10

Hi, I have two "sound cards": one is the integrated sound card on my motherboard and the other is the HDMI output from my video card. The integrated sound works fine with ALSA, but when I tried using pulseaudio, it only sees the HDMI card (according to pactl list). I tried changing /etc/pulse/default.pa: - First, I tried replacing module-udev-detect with module-detect. This resulted in pulse seeing the integrated sound card, but only the S/PDIF output, not the speakers; - Then I tried removing autodetection and using module-alsa-sink directly, but the pulse daemon failed to load the module. Anybody knows how I can get pulse to see my alsa sound card? Thanks, Jerome -- mailto:jeberger@free.fr http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeberger(a)jabber.fr

1 0

[arch-general] The libgmp update
by Hilton Medeiros 28 Mar '10

28 Mar '10

Hello, just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? I just saw that gnunet didn't. Cheers, Hilton

4 4

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] grep-2.6.1-1
by Guillaume Brunerie 27 Mar '10

27 Mar '10

2010/3/27 Jan de Groot <jan(a)jgc.homeip.net> > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 22:57 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > Upstream bug fix release. > > > > Signoff both, > > Allan > > Signoff x86_64. > > On my computer (x86_64), "grep -r a ." segfault, with grep 2.6.1-1. "echo a | grep a" works without problems.

1 0

[arch-general] cups - dependency breaks upgrade "/etc/cups/subscriptions.conf exists"
by David C. Rankin 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

Guys, A cups check on /etc/cups/subscriptions.conf is stopping an update from completing: samba-3.5.1-1-i686.... 10.3M 129.5K/s 00:01:21 [########################################################] 100% ttf-junicode-0.6.17... 910.0K 127.3K/s 00:00:07 [########################################################] 100% vim-bufexplorer-7.2... 16.9K 54.5K/s 00:00:00 [########################################################] 100% xine-lib-1.1.18.1-1... 2.7M 126.6K/s 00:00:22 [########################################################] 100% :: Retrieving packages from community... keepassx-0.4.3-1-i686 1076.7K 128.9K/s 00:00:08 [########################################################] 100% checking package integrity... (247/247) checking for file conflicts [########################################################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) cups: /etc/cups/subscriptions.conf exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Do you want me to open a ticket? I've just move subscriptions.conf as a work around. Shouldn't this situation just result in a .pacnew file instead of stopping the update? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

2 3

[arch-general] Dirty fonts in Chromium
by Nilesh Govindarajan 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

Appearance of sites in Chromium is very dirty, though I didn't change the default font settings. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site & Server Administrator www.itech7.com

2 4

[arch-general] Firefox Spellcheck Missing
by Carlos Mennens 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

I just installed Firefox from Pacman repositories and noticed that I don't have the default add-on spell checker for Mozilla Firefox. I was afraid to download some crappy 3rd party spell checker add-on for Firefox and just wanted a plain English spell checker since I am the worst speller. Can anyone please help me and tell me how I can install / download the default Firefox English spell checker?

3 2

[arch-general] Vim Syntax Highlighter
by Carlos Mennens 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

I noticed today when editing a config file for Postfix in Vim that one value was listed in white text only and everything else was in color. This lead me to beleive the value or parameter was wrong or not being recognized by Postfix configuration but it is. I asked Postfix and the said: "Your VIM syntax highlighter is out of date" Can anyone tell me if there is a way to update this manually if I have the latest version of Vim in my Arch repo?

2 1

Re: [arch-general] gsfonts - package is updated?
by Francois Charette 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

On 26/03/2010 11:18, Xavier Chantry wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Firmicus<Firmicus(a)gmx.net> wrote: > >> PS: Yes, the stupid version numbers for those fonts used upstream by the >> ghostscript project is also part of the mess I was referring to, but far >> worse it the fact that the fonts have not been released as a standalone >> tarball for so long. The fonts themselves (outlines and metrics) are of a >> very high quality, so there is no problem in that respect. It's just that >> the ghostscript project does not seem to care releasing them. The tarball >> was generated by Fedora from the ghostscript svn repo. The new version not >> only fixes the bug mentioned above, but also adds glyphs for Cyrillic. >> >> > Did you try to communicate with upstream ? It is not always bound to failures :) > It just takes a few minutes to write a mail. And sometimes there are results ! > > Done http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687297#c31

1 0

[arch-general] gsfonts - package is updated?
by Ng Oon-Ee 26 Mar '10

26 Mar '10

Repository : extra Name : gsfonts Version : 1.0.7pre44-1 Installed : 8.11-5 URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/ I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the stable version, while the one currently in extra is listed as 'pre' (and doesn't seem available in the sourceforge page?

5 6

[arch-general] tmpfs
by Juan Diego 25 Mar '10

25 Mar '10

Good day everyone, I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab: none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such thing, all the information I could get on the internet is that shm is for POSIX shared memory support and that almost any program actually use it, for devpts I couldn't find much information about it. does anyone knows if it is safe to remove those lines from my fstab? thank you.

5 6