- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] mirrors
by David Rosenstrauch 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Anyone know what's up with the mirrors? Looks like nearly all the US mirrors (RIT, SUU, EasyNews, UMFlint, GaTech, VT - even Schlunix) are running 1-2 days old. Only mirror that seems to have new packages is Unixheads, and it's *dog slow*. Is there some Arch-wide problem going on? TIA, DR

4 3

[arch-general] mplayer sources
by Pierre Chapuis 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Hi, it looks like the sources used by Arch for MPlayer are not just a SVN snapshot of the main trunk. Here's what I did: $ wget ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/mplayer/ mplayer-29411.tar.bz2 $ tar xf mplayer-29411.tar.bz2 $ svn export mplayer mplayer-export-arch $ svn co svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk/ -r 29411 mplayer-svn-29411 $ svn export mplayer-svn-29411 mplayer-export-svn $ diff -r mplayer-export-arch mplayer-export-svn > diff.txt And here's what I got in diff.txt: http://www.friendpaste.com/6JgZsbPEH80zirD88rTazL Can somebody tell me where the changes come from? -- catwell

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clear out
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Firmicus wrote: >> No idea about *uclibc, vim and perl. >> >> > > I have just moved perl to extra. > > F > > perl is core/base pkg :) move it again -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

1 0

[arch-general] Scribus intallation problem
by richard terry 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

(11/11) installing scribus [################################################################################] 100% sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Any clues as to how to overcome this. Thanks. Richard

4 4

[arch-general] How can packages be "Newer than testing"??
by David C. Rankin 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Listmates, On an i586 box with kde4 from testing, I am now unable to login. kdm starts to login, crashes and restarts. (detailed in a separate post) I was hoping that this would be fixed by an update or two, but upon checking this evening, I received the following: 19:27 supersff:~> pms -u :: Synchronizing package databases... kdemod-legacy is up to date testing is up to date kde-unstable is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr 25.2K 47.3K/s 00:00:01 [##################################################] 100% :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: akonadi: local (1.1.95-1) is newer than testing (1.1.2-2) warning: kdebase-runtime: local (4.2.95-1) is newer than testing (4.2.4-2) warning: kdelibs: local (4.2.95-1) is newer than testing (4.2.4-3) local database is up to date Huh??? I guess what it is saying is that akonadi, etc. are newer than the versions in "testing", but why would that message ever be generated with "kde-unstable" available? Also, could this also be a cause of the crashed kdm login on the i586 box? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

2 1

[arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue
by bardo 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Hi guys. Yesterday I rebuild mldonkey since it depended on libjpeg. On x86_64 there are no problems, and everything works as expected; this is not the case for i686, where there's a strange problem: [root@plafone ~]# ldd /usr/bin/mldonkey | grep libjpeg libjpeg.so.7 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 (0xb7f1c000) libjpeg.so.62 => not found The package was created with makechrootpkg in a clean chroot. How is it even possible to link with two different versions of the same library? And where did it get the old version, since it didn't exist in the chroot? I'm trying to rebuild a sane version now, but if anybody has a clue I'd be happy to hear it :P Corrado

3 10

[arch-general] 32bit chroot in 64bit guest
by bardo 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

I've got some packages to upgrade for both arches and I was wondering if it's possible to run a non-native chroot and stop resorting to virtual machines. Given that i686 binaries should be runnable on an x86_64 guest, i just used mkarchroot with an i686-configured pacman.conf, but I get a sudo error when it tries to run makepkg from makechrootpkg. makechrootpkg launches sudo only once, at line 202, and this is the full command: sudo -u nobody makepkg $MAKEPKG_ARGS || touch BUILD_FAILED Now, why require installing sudo in the chroot (standard procedure) if the 'sudo' and 'makepkg' commangs used are *outside* the chroot? Shouldn't they be run through 'mkarchroot -r' to allow cross compilation? Or am I missing something (as usual)? bardo

8 8

[arch-general] Mirror not updating
by David Rosenstrauch 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Anyone have contact info for the rit.edu mirror? It doesn't appear to have been updated since June 30. Thanks, DR

13 25

[arch-general] [AUR-Server] lastsync file on aur.archlinux.org
by Gerhard Brauer 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Hi, since 3-4 days i notice on mirrorchecking that for community repos the status file for indicate the last sync of the mirror switch temporary on some mirrors between actual(synced) and a out-of-sync period from ~16 days. It seems that only mirrors are affected which snyc more than once a day and when theys sync from rsync.archlinux.org. So somewhat "switches" the lastsync file (which is automatically generated by cron each hour on gerolde for all repos). I don't know how or if aur.archlinux.org and gerolde get synced, but please: could one admin look if on aur.al.org is in the community repos a file named lastsync? If you, please remove this so it don't overwrite the generated one on gerolde. If you look currently on: http://users.archlinux.de/~gerbra/mirrorcheck.html you could see several mirror with comminity outdated. And maybe on the next check they are all synced again and overnext check they are bad once more. Short (Sorry for my bad english <g>): If you found a lastsync file on aur.al.org in the repos - please remove it... Gerhard "gerbra"

2 1

[arch-general] About user signoffs
by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Hi all. I would like to know how can we, common and lay users, give signoffs on the packages that we use in testing. I know that arch-public-dev is read only for non developpers and I would like to help too. Can we send the signoffs in this list? Thanks in advance. -- ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto ------------------------------------------- Milton Berle - "If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/milton_berle.html

3 6