- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 46
by Keith 26 May '09

26 May '09

On Tue, 26 May 2009 at 10 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, they're cross posts. Note the [arch-dev-public] in the subject line. Those are cross posts from the public dev list (which is read-only to non devs) Ah - got it. Thank you. Regards...K

1 0

[arch-general] libnl 1.1-1 i686
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

Source package URL gone => Making package: libnl 1.1-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:16 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading libnl-1.1.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz Resolving people.suug.ch... 85.118.1.10, 2001:770:15f::2 Connecting to people.suug.ch|85.118.1.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz [following] --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz Resolving www.infradead.org... 85.118.1.10, 2001:770:15f::2 Connecting to www.infradead.org|85.118.1.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-05-25 18:31:17 ERROR 404: Not Found.

2 3

Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > I am missing something here ? > > > > > > sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u > > building union chroot > > ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > > > > > > I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs > > > > You need to patch makechrootpkg with this: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=2269e5c9 > > Allan > > > Since unionfs has been dropped from kernel-2.6.29.4-1 Please can someone push devtools-2269e5c9 to the repo that devtools installs from. And update the DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot to say you need kernel-2.6.xx and aufs2-utils. I lost 3 days trying to fix this. I needed to build a few packages for a server. Since I have done a Clean install from the latest install CD and sync'd/updated the system my build system broke and following the wiki no longer works. Thanks

2 1

[arch-general] Problem w/Digest?
by Keith 26 May '09

26 May '09

Below are the 1st and last messages contained in the copy of Vol. 55 #44 I received, dated May 24, 5:56 PM EDT. Note the timestamp on message #1: May 23, 9:17 AM UTC. Yet the message quoted within message #10, timestamped May 24, 11:52 UTC, isn't in the digest (or anywhere else I can find). I've noted this numerous times recently and wrote it off to a lousy memory. But it's clearly more than that. Are these cross-posts being replied to? Is the digest dropping messages? Thanks...K Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:17:27 +0000 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot(a)columbus.rr.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general(a)archlinux.org> Message-ID: <1243070247.15748.7.camel(a)desktop.bildanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > Baho Utot wrote: > >> > > I am missing something here ? >> > > >> > > <snip> Message: 10 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:55:59 +0300 From: Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up To: arch-general(a)archlinux.org Message-ID: <20090524215559.GA3136@dark> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote: > > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: > >> >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra >> > > > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > > releases. > > > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090525/b1695e…>

2 1

[arch-general] run-parts source URL bad
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

==> Making package: run-parts 2.31-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:59 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:59-- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/debianutils/debianutils_2.31.tar.gz Resolving ftp.debian.org... 130.89.149.226 Connecting to ftp.debian.org|130.89.149.226|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-05-25 18:32:00 ERROR 404: Not Found. ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz Aborting...

2 1

[arch-general] licenses 2.4-1 - MD5SUM error
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

==> Making package: licenses 2.4-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:20 UTC 2009) ..... ==> Validating source files with md5sums... LICENSE-2.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-sa-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-sa-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-readme.txt ... Passed cddl-1.0.txt ... Passed eclipse-1.0.txt ... Passed gpl-2.0.txt ... Passed gpl-3.0.txt ... Passed lgpl-2.1.txt ... FAILED lgpl.txt ... FAILED fdl.txt ... FAILED lppl.txt ... Passed MPL-1.1.txt ... Passed perlartistic.txt ... Passed 3_0.txt ... Passed LICENSE.txt ... Passed cpl-1.0.txt ... Passed python-2.txt ... Passed LICENSE.ralink-firmware.txt ... Passed ZopePublicLicense.txt ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

2 1

[arch-general] xorg crash with setxkbmap frequently use
by Sergey Manucharian 25 May '09

25 May '09

Hi folks, X server crashes randomly with the following error: [xkb] BOGUS LENGTH in write keyboard desc, expected 5576, got 5592 Graphic card is Intel G965, driver xf86-video-intel, tried both from [extra] and [testing]. I'm using the Caps_Lock key to change the keyboard layout via a script. I do not want to use "grp:caps_toggle" in xkb options since I need to do something else besides just layout switching. My bash script toggles between layouts running "setxkbmap -layout us" or "setxkbmap -layout ru" commands depending on the current one. Once in a while X server crashes on the toggling. Before I used the "stock" method "grp:caps_toggle", and it never crashed. Google finds several bug reports with the similar error string, but they are not related to layout switching. Thanks for ideas! Sergey.

2 3

[arch-general] vi again
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I am trying to build vi in core.....any one have a patch to make it compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? Thanks

2 2

[arch-general] namcap
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync Here is what it said namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files ['usr/bin/fakeroot'] fakeroot W: Dependency included but already satisfied (glibc) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (filesystem) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (grep) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (sed) This is the dependency line from the PKGBUILD depends=('glibc' 'filesystem' 'grep' 'sed') What is namcap telling me ? Could fakeroot be built from a PKGBUILD without those dependencies? And is missing the bash dependency?

3 3

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up
by Grigorios Bouzakis 25 May '09

25 May '09

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > releases. > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg

2 1