- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] vi again
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I am trying to build vi in core.....any one have a patch to make it compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? Thanks

2 2

[arch-general] namcap
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync Here is what it said namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files ['usr/bin/fakeroot'] fakeroot W: Dependency included but already satisfied (glibc) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (filesystem) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (grep) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (sed) This is the dependency line from the PKGBUILD depends=('glibc' 'filesystem' 'grep' 'sed') What is namcap telling me ? Could fakeroot be built from a PKGBUILD without those dependencies? And is missing the bash dependency?

3 3

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up
by Grigorios Bouzakis 24 May '09

24 May '09

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > releases. > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg

2 1

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] Was: telepathy/empathy removed from [testing]
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 24 May '09

24 May '09

Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > Due to lack of developer time to package this fully, the > telepathy/empathy packages sat in [testing] for a long time and become > out dated. Now they have been removed, so these packages are free to > go into [community] if a TU wishes to do so. > > Allan > > > > Hello What about squid? i686 Testing squid 2.7.STABLE6-2 Orphan 2009-03-12 x86_64 Testing squid 2.7.STABLE6-2 Orphan 2009-03-13 i686 Extra squid 2.7.STABLE6-1 Orphan 2009-05-10 x86_64 Extra squid 2.7.STABLE6-1 Orphan 2009-04-26 As can see, the version in extra is more recent (at least in date) that te version in testing (+2 months old) The diff between 1 and 2 is the addition of libcap=>2.16 to depends array. Cheers, -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

2 1

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sqlite3 3.6.14.1-1
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 24 May '09

24 May '09

Andreas Radke wrote: > bump. anyone? No issues with Firefox? > > -Andy > > Works fine here. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Start sequences of daemons in background
by Florian Pritz 23 May '09

23 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Rayner wrote: > This patch allows you to background a whole sequence of daemons, > rather than an individual daemon. As a result, you can get a very fast > parallel boot. I suppose this could be considered an 'arch like' > parallel boot setup. This isn't my idea, I'm sure someone has made a > patch like this before however I couldnt find it and it never got > merged. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12476 (last comment has a good patch) Greetings Florian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKGBIlAAoJEG0WVcFM4cE+OJgP/RMehbQ9dO/E5bQ22IRGoZ6L feSfcF8S3+xLUcZ06A5IrMrSIMlLltVA7yMiS1OGtg+H9+sRmPg3xZndCVWGV5Bz AcKXHO8OYxy/EzErF447f+wGZtnIV9mz6QDvov6TUFrYwj5IdzBSPvbiO6WV/uUv WyMmDuKbvN8jFEZhVjfWNbhfEtDc8pgWUF/RPMIRbqZeii8ZzweD/pBCFsM1Tx1n 50MhF8i0dF8kDRqrNuyAJeN5D++YoZq8CtsXASx+vj2+k+qr3YnqybOu69Dx+RHA axmUDX0D5COyCz0q/XHSRdupr7IjMgNbMwWGy9EaTbbWC5kcgA40PBUkBcZold7d jW52X4q6FVcaU4rkdi3Jx0YUvT5XRRTqM1k6GpUR9fhKOFwK0aVcOuGSLevZ1Ibc qamjCiohqXGx0Xa5YvHre2bB+AKloSj7OshQRi4HjAm7sUebPdvIDG2MWbi0lS5Z 55F8l6vLa1iMFmvlVKlFTEcb5HjnIhVqT+khWBfWjJdOoJMoYDDA7qBl2wLi3eTr J2ytpe4LVfQJhPpWfeVZVpzcW14wVFv2MDuH1UGMKliO0hGbXKl2PhX3fdqXqXYP p7o+A08hWvMQGnktJpr3b6Xe+vvxq2cfBhjrokPMZ9YcdcHpxV+cacGZYX3jyjtQ FaZT0Y1hPtsFUVVrdtVs =6WZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Start sequences of daemons in background
by Damjan Georgievski 23 May '09

23 May '09

> This patch allows you to background a whole sequence of daemons, > rather than an individual daemon. As a result, you can get a very fast > parallel boot. I suppose this could be considered an 'arch like' > parallel boot setup. This isn't my idea, I'm sure someone has made a > patch like this before however I couldnt find it and it never got > merged. > > The major benefit is that boot doesnt get held up by slow starting > dependencies, like hal and network. I can't background network because > I have other services that depend on it such as nfs, ssh, iptables, > ntpdate and cups. Similarly, I cant background hal, as gdm depends on > it. ssh, iptables and cups can be started before your network is up... even more, iptables SHOULD be started before network is up, since it needs to protect you from the first moment > For example... > DAEMONS=(@net-auto,ntpdate,cups @acpi,hal,gdm syslog-ng cpufreq bluetooth crond) > Comma delimited groups are started in background and run in sequence. > > Bootchart testing > I saw a consistent improvement of at least 5s, from 31s to 26s. One > boot somehow acheived 23s, and that was with full auto wireless > enabled. I used a fixed modules list to avoid any inconsistency in > udev time, so udev was always 1.9-2.1 seconds. I also used a wired > connection for network as wireless connection time varied too much. > There is a more noticable improvement with wireless, as it takes > longer and can be backgrounded with the patch. > -- damjan

1 0

Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > I am missing something here ? > > > > > > sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u > > building union chroot > > ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > > > > > > I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs > > > > You need to patch makechrootpkg with this: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=2269e5c9 > > Allan > > > $ sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/scrat/Build/root -- -u building union chroot ERROR: No aufs available. Abandon ship! $ cat /proc/filesystems nodev sysfs nodev rootfs nodev bdev nodev proc nodev binfmt_misc nodev debugfs nodev securityfs nodev sockfs nodev pipefs nodev anon_inodefs nodev tmpfs nodev inotifyfs nodev devpts nodev ramfs nodev mqueue jfs nodev fuse fuseblk nodev fusectl nodev usbfs ext2 The modprobe -q aufs did not happen, lsmod did not show it. modprobe aufs and retrying still fails with no aufs --> ERROR: No aufs available. Abandon ship! Using the latest kernel 2.6.29-4

2 2

[arch-general] calender pgm
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a standalone or web based Any Suggestions?

6 14

[arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

I am missing something here ? sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u building union chroot ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs

2 1