March 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request
by Eric Koenigs 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Ahoy, I've recently submitted the charon package[1], but I've renamed it to charon-flow[2]. Would somebody be so kind as to remove the former? Thanks in advance. Greetings, Eric [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57661 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57828 -- Umlauts? This. Is. QUERTY!

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver
by Maximilian Bräutigam 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hi all, recently, I wrote an ebuild where pkgver=2.4.2 but in the download link a 242 is needed. Thus, I decided to avoid any redundancy and to write _pkgver="${pkgver//\./}". The PKGBUILD is working fine but aur.archlinux.org is expanding the download link to "2.4.2//\./}". Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? This is the package we are talking about: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230 Kind regards, Max

4 5

[aur-general] I would like to maintain mint-x-icons
by Carl George 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, I would like to become the maintainer for mint-x-icons in the AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42041 The package has been out of date for almost three months. I have contacted the current maintainer, Ryan Peters, and he is ok with me adopting it. I have a new PKGBUILD ready to submit for the current version of the package. What do we need to do to complete this? Thanks, Carl

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. dreisner - 6 signoffs 3. thomas - 5 signoffs 4. ibiru - 5 signoffs 5. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [merge-request] sabnzbd-bzr to sabnzbd-git
by Lucky 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, please merge the following packages, because developers switch to git. sabnzbd-bzr [1] to sabnzbd-git [2] [1] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38771> [2] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51772>

2 1

[aur-general] [libccfits] removal
by Nico Nell 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, I've started maintaining ccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4439) and found that there is a duplicate orphaned package called "libccfits" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38912) that should probably be removed. Thanks, ~Nick

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 4. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Schala Zeal 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

I'd like to merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56848 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56849 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57783 It seems this project renamed itself

2 1

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Thanks Xiao-Long. I'll keep the `-dd` option in mind next time I encounter this problem. On the note of leaving a comment on AUR page - how do you even register an account there? Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > Yeah, that would be a problem in the packages then. There shouldn't be > circular dependencies. Maybe you can leave a comment on AUR page about this. > > You don't necessarily need to alter the PKGBUILD's. If you add '-dd' to > the pacman command arguments, it will ignore dependency issues, like > 'pacman -Udd nvidia-bumblebee-295.20-1.pkg.tar.xz'. The dependency loop > only lasts until both packages are installed anyway. > > Regards, > Xiao-Long Chen > > ------------------------------ > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:32:36 +1000 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > To: chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com; aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > > Hello, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: > > loading packages... > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 > > So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the > update has: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") > > which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at > 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") > > Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly > clean. > > Cheers, > Xav > > > > 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav > > >

1 0

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: loading packages... resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the update has: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly clean. Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav >

1 0