March 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] remove request [celtx-bin64]
by member graysky 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

I adopted the 'celtx-bin' package and updated it to the latest version as well as enhanced the support to cover both i686 and x86_64. There is also a package called celtx-bin64 which is now redundant. The maintainer of this package agrees that we should remove it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46977

2 1

[aur-general] please merge/delete
by Daniel Wallace 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

this is a new package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57714 andoidscreencast I just had the maintainer disown it and I fixed it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57719 androidscreencast-git thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community
by Stefan Husmann 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Am 12.03.2012 21:20, schrieb Aaron Griffin: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kaspar Bumke<kaspar.bumke(a)gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM > Subject: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community > To: aaron(a)archlinux.org > > > Hi, > > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? > > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages are currently > orphans in community. Additionally, avr-gcc is flagged out of date. I > work with AVRs on Arch Linux and would be willing to take over > maintaining these packages. > > I have been using Arch for over two years now and you can have a look > at my small contributions to the AUR and Wiki: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=kasbah > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kasbah > > I would be delighted to be able to contribute more by maintaining > these packages and would be willing to put the time in to learn what I > need to be a maintainer. I can see that Jelle van der Waa is currently > maintainer on avrdude and avr-libc and if he/she is willing to adopt > these packages they may be a better maintainer than me. > > Kind Regards, > > Kaspar > I think, aur-general is the more appropiate list for [community]-packages.

1 0

[aur-general] [ike.devolder@gmail.com: Re: Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671]
by Martti Kühne 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

----- Forwarded message from Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:53:50 +0100 From: Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120217 Thunderbird/10.0.2 Op 17-03-12 05:44, alexander.r(a)gmx.com schreef: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:12:52PM +1100, alexander.r(a)gmx.com wrote: >> Package xf86-video-sis671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34256) is outdated, broken >> and lacks some features that xf86-sis-m671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47620) have (support for >> 1366x768 resolution and others). Anyway it is just feature-lacking >> version of xf86-video-sisimedia in [community] and therefore should be >> removed and have it's votes merged into xf86-sis-m671 to preserve votes >> of sis761 chipset owners in AUR. >> -- >> My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR > ---end quoted text--- > > Am I ignored O_o ? Anyway sorry and please forget about previous message; better > disown xf86-sis-m671 (it was said to be useless and marked as outdated long ago) > and merge it into xf86-video-sis671, which I just updated. no you are not ignored but you are not the maintainer of xf86-sis-m671 so if you get hellnest to confirm the merge here we can do that -- Ike ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

[aur-general] Delete rEFIt package
by Keshav P R 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Hi, rEFIt[1] has not been updated in over two years by upstream, does not build under linux (any distro) as of now, and is orphaned. I have uploaded refind-x86_64[2] which is a fork of rEFIt. It currently builds under linux and contains bugfixes. Please delete the rEFIt package. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14837 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57632

2 3

[aur-general] Please merge/delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu
by Kevin Vesga 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Please delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu [1] as the maintainer has made a new package cairo-ubuntu-xcb [2]. Or you can merge them I suppose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44663 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52780

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 9 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs 5. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: python3-lxml
by Tim Koopman 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

The package is available in community as python-lxml. Tim

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: zathura-girara-git and zathura-git
by karnath 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please, merge votes of zathura-girara-git [1] with zathura-git [2] and delete zathura-girara-git [2] since girara branch is now main development branch and is used in zathura-git. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48569 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30285 -- E-Mail : karnathtorjian(a)gmail.com

2 1