- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 27 Dec '12

27 Dec '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc32-allegro_pas/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc32-allegro_pas/>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-x86_64-win64-allegro_pas/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-x86_64-win64-allegro.pas/> Gave these packages a slightly more appropriate renaming, so these are no longer needed.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: libutempter
by Jekyll Wu 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

libutempter is already in [extra]. The AUR package is outdated and not actively maintained. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libutempter/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libutempter/

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete gstreamer0.10-rtsp-git
by David Spicer 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

Please delete my old gstreamer0.10-rtsp-git package [1]. The git code for gst-rtsp is now targeted on gstreamer 1.1.x, so the package name is wrong, and it depends on current gstreamer-plugins-base git, which isn't available from the AUR as far as I can see. Many thanks. David Spicer [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gstreamer0.10-rtsp-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 14 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * vicious-2.1.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ldc-20121225-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ldc-20121225-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (14 total) == * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: codeblocks-dbgbranch-svn
by Jekyll Wu 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

The branch has been merged, and it doesn't build now. I don't see much value in keeping it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeblocks-dbgbranch-svn/

2 1

[aur-general] Please Remove fcitx3
by Yichao Yu 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

Hi, Please remove the fcitx3[1] package from AUR. It is out-of-date (and the next major version, i.e. fcitx4, is in [community] and is already stable now), not supported, orphaned, and no one reply to my marking-out-of-date and comment almost two months ago. THX. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fcitx3/ Yichao Yu

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete xine-lib-1.2-vdr-hg
by David Spicer 26 Dec '12

26 Dec '12

Please delete my old xine-lib-1.2-vdr-hg package [1]. VDR support is enabled by default in xine-lib 1.2 so a separate package is no longer necessary. The well out-of-date xine-lib-vdr package [2] could also be deleted for the same reason. Many thanks. David Spicer [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xine-lib-1.2-vdr-hg/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xine-lib-vdr/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: some lxpolkit packages
by Jekyll Wu 25 Dec '12

25 Dec '12

All the following three customized packages are dumped by the same submitters, and fail to build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-disk-utility-lxpolkit https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-disk-utility-lxpolkit-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsoup-gnome-lxpolkit

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Dec '12

25 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (i686) * ldc-20121225-1 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-2 (i686) * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (x86_64) * ldc-20121225-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * vicious-2.1.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ldc-20121225-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ldc-20121225-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown java-xml-commons-external
by 小龙陈 25 Dec '12

25 Dec '12

Hi, Would it be possible to disown the java-xml-commons-external package? I've contacted the maintainer over a month ago and I haven't received a reply. I uploaded a java-xml-commons-external-fixed package while waiting for a response from the maintainer, but it was deleted today by falconindy without notice. I'd appreciate it if, next time, TU's would write a message to the mailing list first, so I have time to fix the packages that depend on it and I don't need to rewrite the deleted PKGBUILDs. Thanks. Best regards, Xiao-Long Chen By the way, the PKGBUILD[1] and tarball[2] are still accessible even though java-xml-commons-external-fixed was deleted. I don't know if that's a bug. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ja/java-xml-commons-external-fixed/PKGBU… [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ja/java-xml-commons-external-fixed/java-…

2 1