- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Compiling emacs lisp files
by Mika Fischer 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hi, I'm currently maintaining the ninja package on the AUR [1]. Recently, there has been an issue about which I'd like to ask for your advice: ninja contains an files for emacs to support edititng the rules files of ninja. A user suggested that I compile the provided .el file to an .elc file. I did that, but then other users complained about the build-dependency on emacs. Now another user suggested that in the PKGBUILD, I should check whether emacs is installed and only then compile the .el file. I'm not totally opposed to this, but it feels a bit strange that the package is different, depending on the system it's built on. What would you do in this situation? Thanks in advance! Best, Mika [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ninja/

5 4

[aur-general] Could anyone help me to adopt 'fossil' package?
by Daniel YC Lin 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

It is outdated for more then one month.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete suckless *-hg packages (suckless.org has moved to git)
by Andreas Wagner 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hello, I have uploaded dmenu-git and and dmc-git to replace dmenu-hg and dmc-hg because suckless.org has moved to git. Could someone here delete the following packages: dmenu-hg dmc-hg Eventually, we should move the rest of the packages over too. Thanks, Andreas

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove (orphaned) pyhyphen and rename python-pysrt
by Veli-Jussi Raitila 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Please remove the pyhyphen package (superceded by python-pyhyphen / python2-pyhyphen) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyhyphen/ Also rename python-pysrt to python2-pysrt https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pysrt/ Thanks! -- BR, VJ

2 3

[aur-general] Remove request for python2-distutils2
by Lucas Saliés Brum 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Maybe duplicated? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-distutils2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-distutils2/ Original?: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-distutils-extra/ The last one from AUR is outdated. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] A TU keeps removing harmless and relevant comments from my package's webpage
by Xavion 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Dear TUs & Devs, For obvious reasons, I decided to add the following comment to my popular-packages <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/>webpage on the AUR recently: "As I'm the author of this little script, I will always want it to remain in the AUR". However, I just noticed that the comment has been removed. I'm assuming that Alexander (xyproto) <https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xyproto>probably did this (silently) as he's the one who removed all prior comments a couple of days earlier. I'm not suggesting that my package will become popular enough to enter [community]. I just have a policy of adding a comment like the one listed above after uploading something that I authored. Can someone explain why the TU who removed the above comment considered it so off-topic that it had to go? Based on the nature of the comment, I think the decision to remove it was a bit extreme. Can someone please reinstate the comment to that webpage? If it was Alexander who removed it, I'd also like to know whether he has anything better to do with his time than troll and nitpick like this. -- Regards, Xavion.

8 11

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate package php-mongodb
by Jarek Sedlacek 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Package php-mongodb [1] is a duplicate of php-mongo[2]. I emailed the maintainer of php-mongodb, he is fine with the it being merged into php-mongo. Can these be merged (or php-mongodb deleted)? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongodb/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongo/ Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1