- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-1 (any) * oss-4.2_2006-4 (i686) * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (i686) * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (i686) * oss-4.2_2006-4 (x86_64) * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * initscripts-systemd-20120704.1-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-1 (any) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 24 signoffs 2. tomegun - 11 signoffs 3. bisson - 9 signoffs 4. allan - 7 signoffs 5. eric - 7 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Axilleas Pi 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Please delete gnome-shell-theme-ice-cream-sandwich [1]. It's now named gnome-shell-theme-holo [2] as stated in comments [1] by the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55964 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56046

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 19 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (19 total) == * initscripts-systemd-20120704.1-1 (any) * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * initscripts-systemd-20120704.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 8 signoffs 2. allan - 8 signoffs 3. thomas - 4 signoffs 4. stephane - 3 signoffs 5. eric - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] final leg of /lib removal
by Oon-Ee Ng 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

On Jul 4, 2012 3:38 AM, "Tom Gundersen" <teg(a)jklm.no> wrote: > We all know that no one reads the news items, nor dev-public, so I > think adding an extra warning should save us a few hundred > mails/forumposts/IRC conversations. > > -t I see a good opportunity to start pruning the list of users of all the above channels =). The same users who don't read the above may not notice post-upgrade messages either. On the flip side, most custom kernel users should be more savvy than the average, do I don't see much of a problem. I maintain two aur kennels, shall I implement the move now (seems like it'd work even before kmod upgrades)?

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: terminal.app
by Jekyll Wu 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

It has been outdated (and orphaned?) for a long time, and it fails to build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26749

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Stefan Husmann 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Hello, please delete these empty packages: edloaa-meta https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54522 cow_backup https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60000 Regards Stefan

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] final leg of /lib removal
by Ike Devolder 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Op dinsdag 3 juli 2012 11:41:08 schreef Dave Reisner: > Hey all, > > *** If you use a custom kernel, this will affect you. Please read the > big scary note at the end *** > > I'm taking today to work on the last roadblock before Allan can move > glibc out of /lib. This basically consists of a rebuild of: > > - kmod (to drop our local patch) > - linux, linux-lts (diff for linux here: http://paste.xinu.at/LLd/) > - all OOT kernel modules (for /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-*) > - bash-completion (temp patch until /lib is a symlink: > http://paste.xinu.at/xEs/) > > I'll be doing this all locally to avoid building against allan's new > toolchain in [staging]. This will hopefully all hit [testing] by the > end of the day. You know where to find me if you have any questions or > angry rants. > > If you'd like to do some early testing, I'm leaving the rebuilt kmod and > kernel packages on gerolde: > > http://dev.archlinux.org/~dreisner/linux-usrmove/ > > (i686 packages are lagging behind at the moment) > > BIG SCARY NOTE: Due to the kmod changes, this will BREAK all module > tools for users with their own kernels. If you do not rebuild your > kernel after pulling in the new kmod, you're going to have a bad time. > See the paste link above for inspiration. > > Cheers! > Dave I'm replying on this in arch-general and aur-general because i cant post in arch-dev. So if i understand correctly we (the people running custom kernels) can't prepare for this ? There is no way of moving the modules already to /usr/lib ? I assume kmod now only looks in /lib. Another note, people with custom repositories should move their kernels in sync with the official repositories ? --Ike

2 1

[aur-general] Could I adopt 'bvi' package
by Daniel YC Lin 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

I found it lack maintain for some years. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1288

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120612-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Rename/Merge Request (python-texttable)
by Jason St. John 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Hello, I am requesting that python-texttable[1] be renamed/merged into python2-texttable[2]. I am not aware of a Python 3 version of this package, which is why I'm requesting it be merged. Additionally, [1] is out-of-date and the PKGBUILD has a lot of room for improvement, which I have cleaned up in my new package[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39012 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60499 Thanks!

2 1