- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: komodoedit-beta and komodoide
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 28 Jun '12

28 Jun '12

[komodoedit-beta](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39532) is duplicate to [komodo-edit-testing](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53616) which provides not just beta version but all pre-released versions. [komodoide](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27859) is duplicate to [komodo-ide](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49237) which is in a better naming and up to date.Better merge [komodoide] into [komodo-ide].

2 1

[aur-general] small AUR cleanup
by Kevin Vesga 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Please delete these four packages. Xyne has removed their source and bauerbill/powerpill likely wouldn't work with the latest pacman anyways. [1] bauerbill - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52251 [2] perl-xyne-arch - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52252 [3] perl-xyne-common - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52253 [4] powerpill - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52254 Please delete geany-colorschemes [5] as it has been superseded by geany-themes [6]. [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35555 [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53889 Please merge qutim [7] into qutim-stable [8]. [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17708 [8] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58695 Please delete aim [9] as the source is gone. [9] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=692

3 2

[aur-general] Merge packages
by Keshav P R 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hi, Please merge grub2-efi-bzr [1] into grub-efi-x86_64-bzr [2] and grub2-bios-bzr [3] into grub-bios-bzr [4] . I renamed the packages to follow http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023148.html . Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40290 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60357 [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41055 [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60360 Regards. Keshav

4 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120612-7 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120612-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. pierre - 5 signoffs 3. eric - 4 signoffs 4. stephane - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge package
by Kevin Vesga 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Please merge gedit-latex-plugin [1] into gedit-latex [2]. gedit-latex-plugin is currently outdated and the maintainer recommends using the latter package anyways. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13115 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52897

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: udj-git
by Jonathan Frederickson 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Package udj-git was incorrectly named. It has been reuploaded as udj-desktop-client-git. Please remove the original package. Original: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60238 Corrected: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60371

2 1

[aur-general] How long to wait for package update?
by oliver 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Hi, I just added a comment to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31746 It seems the package has not changed since two years, even it was flagged out of date. I now sent a link to the sources (the old place was not available anymore). How long should I wait until the maintainer updates the package? I would adapt the package if the maintainer will not update the package. I also did added the maintainer into Cc of this mail, hoping to get soon response. Ciao, Oliver

6 8

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120612-6 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120612-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.2.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 9 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 3 signoffs 3. bluewind - 3 signoffs 4. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [New] Uploaded colormake-git package
by Mateusz Loskot 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

Hi, I have just uploaded first release of colormake-git package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60182 I'm hoping it is in good shape. Also, currently in AUR, there is only old colormake 0.2 available: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40340 whereas colormake 0.9 has been released a while ago: http://bre.klaki.net/programs/colormake/ Shall I try to refresh it to colormake 0.9? BTW, there is no sign of colormake in official repositories: www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=colormake Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

2 2

[aur-general] sks
by David Benfell 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm still relatively new to Arch, so I'm still finding my way around and becoming familiar with the Arch Way. I'm interested in sks. It is presently set up for version 1.1.2 from a source location that is no longer available. The package is now on bitbucket and the current version is 1.1.3. It depends upon an Ubuntu package, but a current Debian package is available. I tried tweaking the PKGBUILD but the build fails--something to do with cryptokit. I have left a comment but have not emailed the maintainer. My inclination is to think the package should be flagged as 'out of date'. Is that correct? - -- David Benfell benfell(a)parts-unknown.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP57HGAAoJELT202JKF+xpxhgQAIuzMPwgTPnBC36F57Rb5MnD oEDbnokt+z1egsOlp/vHG/aTHDCngDgwkndS8NQTka8XNzIPKSU+w1O1+Emp7Lfj LgABpD8NYCuXiZgkdMIpT8r4lbTXoRAQU5CAraIkooYrNzTnCGmZT1SjBgAsvnvP zTy9R4Yr8lWczP3O8QUZPrJNviQtDx5VBp2PlQ8paKaRGwOuI/Avx2HTl71DHQJA 1wBLlRqWo2/Pm2YJX2beiBQeDgztNpWUOPdQmtOQPdembSirGqKNHWza29DsNA+l kdeF93ccGrIRW6NO0m1681/X68v4F/Jg99aq28x9J8zJfQcSyaM+EHkI5GEXAj4h TdwvgzMdTfuNBJFmw3RiXBDleQvGnHMj787nkesC+TyuUkih7eA3w1c8CERQX4A/ jbPG7AfHQvb02Dz8jTKe5r83uEa4hqiSlSMFmlmmY8UwzDPta1mAAplTu43aBhc+ bgzYB8EFu58zSpdJpwa11IOTS9BTw6w6DfpXdhRtUTRO6GppXgZ6SFmWWEuNikWh D+tCabwQ/XhjZmIEMdtbdfQ/2JOL8fRAfpRorc2RbRhFobsxVjvOD09fyqxLgOku Zkc/QgnjAJXdWmYXt2gKELOhDo4O5T6vMgghfZJj9+q3KR79ewcUg7sjzJ2/sAoe dwm0sSDxl18eWDDzqgiG =ZPXv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3