Forwarded a response from JaDa to myself:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JaDa <jada(a)usalug.net>
Date: Feb 13, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions
To: "travis(a)archlinux.org" <travis(a)archlinux.org>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:58:00 -0800, Travis Willard <travis(a)archlinux.org>
> On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst
>> depends on our packaging scheme?
> Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific
> packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages.
> I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.
Don't change anything. Let it like it is. If you later running in trouble
then think again.
By the why,
I am using at the Radeon Xpress 200m, 9550, X300, X1300, X850, and I
didn't see any differant's. It works! If it doesn't work I will email you
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.