January 2019 - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] pambase in testing breaks email
by Genes Lists 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

pambase 20190105.1-1 caused bad failure for email. The error I saw immediately was from postfix failing to authenticate users via saslauthd which in turn blames pam. Downgrading back to 20171006-1 restores email funtioning ok. Logs say: saslauthd[22214]: pam_warn(smtp:auth): function=[pam_sm_authenticate] flags=0x8000 service=[smtp] terminal=[<unknown>] user=[lists] ruser=[<unknown>] rhost=[<unknown>] saslauthd[22214]: DEBUG: auth_pam: pam_authenticate failed: Authentication failure saslauthd[22214]: do_auth : auth failure: [user=lists] [service=smtp] [realm=] [mech=pam] [reason=PAM auth error]

2 4

[arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)
by Jayesh Badwaik 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

Test Message -- Best Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io

2 2

[arch-general] [Xfce] Notification area tooltips gone
by Murari 30 Jan '19

30 Jan '19

Hi all, For some months now, the icons in my notification area haven't been showing me tooltips. I don't quite know when this started, but I do remember that this was working before. I get tooltips for all my launchers in the panel, but neither the Power Manager system tray icon nor the NetworkManager applet show any tooltips on mouseover. FWIW, ~/.gtkrc-2.0 has 'gtk-enable-tooltips=1'. Is there a setting somewhere that has changed, or is this a bug I should file with XFCE? Best, Murari

2 2

[arch-general] Request to remove an invalid header from the python-pillow package
by Antony Lee 27 Jan '19

27 Jan '19

Hi all, I have reported in https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/57492 (nearly a year ago) that python-pillow installs an invalid header in /usr/include/python3.7m/raqm.h, which 1) upstream clearly did not intend to be packaged, and 2) prevents the building of Python extensions modules that actually want to use libraqm (because /usr/include/python3.7m/raqm.h shadows /usr/include/raqm.h). Unfortunately, the report has seen no activity since last April, even though I proposed a (simple) fix for it (add `rm "$pkgdir/usr/include/python$_py3basever/raqm.h"` to package_python-pillow()). Is there anything I can do to get it fixed? Thanks, Antony

1 0

[arch-general] How to grant Apache httpd permission to serve files from my home directory?
by Peter Nabbefeld 26 Jan '19

26 Jan '19

Hello, how can I grant Apache httpd permissions to present files out of my home directory? Especially, I don't want to only serve files from my home folder, and I don't want to give it full root access. To be more specific, I want to serve a small tutorial project in Python via uWSGI. I guess, first httpd needs the rights to delegate, then uWSGI needs rights to access the scripts. Both are currently running as http:http. This is not being thought as a permanent solution, just only for "quick & dirty" deployment, as always thinking about copying etc. during learning phase is rather inconvenient. Kind regards Peter

4 5

[arch-general] [OT] Problems with uwsgi/Python and httpd
by Peter Nabbefeld 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Hello, I've tried to get Python working with Apache httpd and mod_proxy_uwsgi, but access to it results in an Error 503. In httpd.conf I activated the module. In vhosts configuration, I made the following related entries: DocumentRoot "/srv/http/my.host.name/" <Directory "/srv/http/"> Options -Indexes </Directory> <Location "/bud/"> ProxyPass uwsgi://127.0.0.1:3031/ </Location> In location /srv/http/my.host.name/bud/ there's a script named buddy.py: def application(env, start_response): start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type','text/html')]) return [b"Hello World"] The URL I'm using is: http://my.host.name/bud/buddy In /etc/uwsgi/vassals there's a configuration "example.ini": [uwsgi] chdir = /srv/http/my.host.name/bud module = buddy plugins = python I've started uwsgi in emperor mode, starting "emperor.uwsgi.service".|| What am I doing wrong? Kind regards Peter PS: I've tried to find the necessary information in Arch Wiki or in the uwsgi docs (e,.g. copied the Python example there ;-) ), but it seems I'm missing some "glue" ....

1 2

[arch-general] php-pear compromised
by Andy Pieters 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Any of you seen the news about php-pear? There's an AUR package that downloads from pear.php.net so if that was within the last 6 months it could have been the compromised one? https://thehackernews.com/2019/01/php-pear-hacked.html

3 4

[arch-general] Where does /usr/bin/uwsgi come from?
by Peter Nabbefeld 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Hello all, I've got sth. strange: I wanted to install the "uwsgi" package, but the binray is already installed. "pacman -Qo uwsgi" results in "No package owns /usr/bin/uwsgi" (German: "Kein Paket besitzt /usr/bin/uwsgi"). So, why is it on my laptop? I'd guess it's probably been installed at some time with apache httpd but has been removed later, but don't know. Anybody knows about such an issue? Kind regards Peter

3 6

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Proposal: minimal base system
by Damjan Georgievski 23 Jan '19

23 Jan '19

(posting to general, since I can't on dev-public) On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 23:03, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > # Proposal > > There is no strict definition of what a minimal Arch Linux system > installation must contain. However in reality we mostly don’t add any > packages that are in the base group as a dependency to other packages, > which basically makes it a hard requirement. > > The current way of defining a minimal system via a group is non-optimal > for the following reasons: One of the issues that might need to be fixed is this: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/54887 (FS#54887 - [openssl] remove perl from dependency of the openssl package) -- damjan

2 1

[arch-general] modprobe, Exec format error
by siefke_listen＠web.de 17 Jan '19

17 Jan '19

Hello, againt want try to work little with wireguard and now something with the module happen. # modprobe wireguard modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'wireguard': Exec format error # uname -a Linux fr-rb-1 4.20.2-arch1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 13 17:49:00 UTC 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux # pacman -Ss linux | grep installed testing/linux 4.20.2.arch1-1 (base) [installed] testing/linux-headers 4.20.2.arch1-1 [installed] core/linux 4.20.1.arch1-1 (base) [installed: 4.20.2.arch1-1] core/linux-api-headers 4.17.11-1 [installed] core/linux-firmware 20181218.0f22c85-1 (base) [installed] core/linux-headers 4.20.1.arch1-1 [installed: 4.20.2.arch1-1] So normal is all installed what needed. # pacman -Ss wireguard | grep installed community/wireguard-arch 0.0.20181218-2 [installed] community/wireguard-tools 0.0.20181218-2 [installed] Have someone a idea? Silvio

2 1