- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] [Solved] Re: PKGBUILD ERROR
by Ralf Mardorf 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:02:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:32:59 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: >>As Ralf said, nothing *requires* yaourt, and indeed some things will >>blow up when you try installling via yaourt -- but standard makepkg >>handles fine, and indeed so do most AUR wrappers, in the AUR Helpers >>comparison chart [1] see the "Clean build" entry for yaourt. ;) [2] > >FWIW I'm using yaourt and usually it doesn't fail. There's just one >issue I encounter from time to time, but that also happens when using >makepkg. By default I set up makepkg to build in tmpfs and it >sometimes is too small. One time building a kernel failed, but usually >building default Arch kernels works with around 2 GiB tmpfs. If I build >a bloated web browser, such as e.g. firefox, the around 2 GiB tmpfs >don't provide the needed space. IMO building in tmpfs isn't really >faster, but I like it, because I don't need to tidy up tmpfs ;). Btw. >makepkg is set up to save the packages not in the tmpfs, but in a cache >to archive packages. My apologies. Just for fun I read the "Clean build" entry. That's correct! The setting to build in tmpfs is for yaourt, I just tend to run makepkg in tmpfs too. However, indeed, if it fails I build outside tmpfs using makepkg.

2 2

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] Arch general mailing list
by Florian Pritz 12 Sep '15

12 Sep '15

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:48:39 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com> wrote: > 2 mails I send to Arch general more then 12 hours ago didn't come > through the list. I received no postmaster, no mailman and no moderator > message. For testing purpose I resend one of those two mails a few > minutes ago and it also didn't come through. Please send me a list of Message-IDs of the mails that are missing so I have something to look for. In most clients you should be able to view the message source (Thunderbird and at least my claws-mail have it bound to crtl+u) and then look for the Message-ID header. Also for kicks I'm sending this to arch-general myself. Let's see if it works. Florian

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [Solved] Re: PKGBUILD ERROR
by Ralf Mardorf 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:02:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >Btw. makepkg is set up to save the packages not in the tmpfs, but in a >cache to archive packages. Again apologies. I meant that I set up my makepkg.conf to save packages in a cache.

1 0

[arch-general] Fw: important
by 888poker 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

Hello! Important message, visit http://instalacje-bialystok.pl/once.php?fx2 888poker

1 0

[arch-general] Fw: important
by juergen＠hoetzel.info 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

Hello! Important message, visit http://obogowie.pl/future.php?jb juergen(a)hoetzel.info

1 0

[arch-general] gpg-agent
by edson duarte 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 hi! for some time now, gpg-agent complains about "--write-env-file" being an obsolete option, but in the wiki[1] still says to configure ~/.bash_profile using this option. i don't really know how gpg-agent works so, someone knows how to correctly configure it? [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GnuPG#gpg-agent thanks, - -- edson duarte https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV8jsDAAoJEEuaWOJw2A3LrMkP/12Zq+AJXIilcBVu9LfalXN7 U4sjG5HsXM36V6LsGxBiyipP7LunX/N1M7hMWMm15+UohbYBihwIm4y3UibF3d2S ttRiHu/nZermcXrdf8IUvo8WImXRn3uT5N8NRM7hYFUS2HHdQ8b8zKMppn48pGFl RcuEsqv8wf+YikjBp0B75nt0ArIvH4r38CLPg/T/Xu/uD59Sq166XkeBcoZUWSdQ 8Kd/vqFEdMSlIohU+ujGOtC+YhVoDFs0MJKKCQDlL4iRmT8e9wLD7/7oqdoL1f3Z 3rITi9Z2LJW+Kzq/0CxPiz2afF4inVp1y+WfRuEJpPy/ooW1N01f09IGVesGr3L6 TuqHXiAitU1dPlcWNEnvQguvG+tg9Coenacgitir+I8wBWclfXq6igQHxNc1HTGK IZxmr70iBALlXDm5BzE+cliheEslC6dx/CWsBn0QYaPM1XpGYTnbZ5tSQ1RqC+iV OCUTdCpU5SKpKXwd8QW55e1Ofzndid053GYSUnEQ5IkNGX29//hvQBme4j3XWTQI W0yxQXb/slWvomEpfuci9rJ3587bTPxnUUsdHYT7MJ8SFRFNhSKUa59yMMU2d3q1 GW8OnF6UYqsDYbwrcfoDD2MvKi+ZTfbbKHZOYiGyJZowL5MV06m6VSBQHIhh3goJ 5e+1ED4zH3YxckZb5rgX =gEVz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

[arch-general] PKGBUILD ERROR
by mudongliang 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

I got the following errors in "yaourt -S sublime-text-dev" : sublime-text-dev 3.3083-2 (2015-07-07 21:14) ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) ==> ------------------------------------ ==> y Please add $VISUAL to your environment variables for example: export VISUAL="vim" (in ~/.bashrc) (replace vim with your favorite editor) ==> Edit PKGBUILD with: vim ==> ERROR: Running makepkg as root is not allowed as it can cause permanent, catastrophic damage to your system. Unable to read PKGBUILD Waiting for help.Thank you all! - mudongliang

6 14

[arch-general] Makefile possibly removed libc?
by vattan 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

So I am trying to learn about c programming and I was editing a simple c program I got off the web. I was modifing the makefile to understand what it does and after building it from inside sublimetext 2 I noticed that my root directory had zero free space. I rebooted and had 2 gigs free again, but now when I try to launch sublime text I get a segfault. Dmesg reports an error 4 in libc-2.21.so I have not had any internet connection on this machine for 2 months so I know it wasn't update related. My key suspect is the last few line of the make file which I thought I had commented out but actually missed and read: Clean: rm -f *.so rm -f coil rm -f tables When I built it from the terminal in its directory it may have been fine, but when I built it thru sublime I suspect the path was different in some way and it deleted files it shouldn't have. Can anyone help me out here? Sublime is what this pc is for and I am kind of hosed! Can I just rebuild some library? Is my suspicion misplaced and you need more info? Is there a way to see what files have been deleted in the last 24 hours dispite a reboot?/ Thanks!

5 4

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD ERROR
by 杨令 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: mudongliang <mudongliangabcd(a)outlook.com> > To: arch-general(a)archlinux.org > Cc: > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:28:59 +0800 > Subject: [arch-general] PKGBUILD ERROR > I got the following errors in "yaourt -S sublime-text-dev" : > > sublime-text-dev 3.3083-2 (2015-07-07 21:14) > ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! ) > ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort) > ==> ------------------------------------ > ==> y > > Please add $VISUAL to your environment variables > for example: > export VISUAL="vim" (in ~/.bashrc) > (replace vim with your favorite editor) > > ==> Edit PKGBUILD with: vim > > ==> ERROR: Running makepkg as root is not allowed as it can cause > permanent, > catastrophic damage to your system. > Unable to read PKGBUILD > > Waiting for help.Thank you all! > - mudongliang > > I guess you run `sudo yaourt -S sublime-text-dev` which is not correct. You needn't run `yaourt` with sudo. yaourt will ask for password when it needs Try to run `yaourt -S sublime-text-dev` --- YANG

1 0

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 131, Issue 10
by vattan 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:19:08 +0200 > From: Jens Adam <jra(a)byte.cx> > To: arch-general(a)archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Makefile possibly removed libc? > Message-ID: <20150910131908.3b1fd16d(a)titan.byte.cx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:13:22 +0200 > Chris Sakalis <chrissakalis(a)gmail.com>: > > > Hi Vattan, > > > > You can use pacman to check what files each package is supposed to > > have. A quick google search nets me a bash script [1] to do that. > > [...] > > [1] - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=34281 > > Yes, you can use pacman to check what files each package is supposed to > have: with pacman -Q(q)k(k), see the manpage. > > --byte Thanks guys, but pacman -qk sublime-text and glibc both listed a pile of files and said nothing was missing. Normally when I screw up this bad id uninstall/reinstall but I will not have net access on this machine for another two weeks so its sneaker net for me. any other ideas?

1 0