January 2011 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Delete request
by Xavier D. 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Hello, Please delete xivo-client-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44283) as it has been renamed to xivo-client-qt-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45228) Thanks!

2 1

Re: [aur-general] partitionmanager-svn problems
by Luca Bennati 09 Jan '11

09 Jan '11

2011/1/9 Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> > On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:34:35 Luca Bennati wrote: > > This app https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22778 have problems > in > > the PKBUILD being it over an year old, but upstream is active and > maintainer > > is not: all his packages have been marked outdated. > > What to do? Is it necessary to contact him? > I orphaned Reiser's packages because all are flagged as out-of-date from > time > and with missing make/dependencies; list: > - grub2-btrfs > - hypervideoconverter > - partitionmanager-svn > - qmmp-svn > > -- > Andrea > Well, ok, i sent him the email nonetheless :) I'll upload the new PKGBUILD asap.

1 0

[aur-general] partitionmanager-svn problems
by Luca Bennati 09 Jan '11

09 Jan '11

This app https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22778 have problems in the PKBUILD being it over an year old, but upstream is active and maintainer is not: all his packages have been marked outdated. What to do? Is it necessary to contact him?

3 2

[aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request
by Cédric Girard 08 Jan '11

08 Jan '11

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. Thanks, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 -- Cédric Girard

4 11

[aur-general] ipython3 duplicated
by François Boulogne 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi, I noticed ipython3 [1] and ipython3-git [2] pkgbuilts are strictly the same. Since, it is synchronized from a git repository, I suggest to remove [1]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42460 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42461 Cheers, -- François Boulogne. Membre de l'April - Promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre http://www.april.org

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request - xml-light
by Thomas S Hatch 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Please delete xml-light, it is a misnamed duplicate of ocaml-xml-light http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12207

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request
by H.Gökhan SARI 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hello, There is package named 'nautilussvn' in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26289) However, this package is obsolete because project is renamed as rabbitvcs and a newer version is published. Newer package is rabbitvcs-nautilus ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34482) So, nautilussvn package should be deleted. Thanks, -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 1

[aur-general] please delete pygit2-git
by Hervé Cauwelier 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi, I long hesitated between naming my package "pygit2-git" (to follow the upstream name) and python-libgit2-git (to follow the Python naming scheme). I chose the latter and added "pygit2" in the description so people still find it. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43692 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] [aur general] Seeking the TU wisdom
by Thomas S Hatch 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Ok, I have a bit of a problem with a pair of packages, puppet and facter. As it stands the puppet package in the aur is broken, it builds but it does not run properly. The puppet package in the AUR is configured to run on ruby 1.9, puppet does not run properly on ruby 1.9 yet, and the pacman plugin for puppet that is supplied with the package no longer works properly. The package has also been out of date for a few weeks. I have contacted the maintainer and I was promised that my fixes would be applied, but they were not, so I made a duplicate, puppet-ruby1.8 and facter-ruby1.8, I am using these packages in production and they work very well. I even open up a github account, forked Miah's puppet package, applied the changes and requested a pull as requested. But the package remains out of date and broken, so my question is this, does this constitute grounds for having a TU orphan the packages so I can update them, make them work, and get rid of my duplicates? Or should I continue more diplomatically? -Tom Hatch

4 11

[aur-general] Packages removal request
by Maciej Sitarz 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hello all, please remove this packages (all mine): *bash-completion-netcfg* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24127 reason: merged into official netcfg package *firefox-spell-en-gb* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30343 reason: hunspell-* packages now include all necessary dictionaries *firefox-spell-pl* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19409 reason: hunspell-* packages now include all necessary dictionaries Thanks -- Maciek Sitarz

2 1