January 2011 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by notizblock 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

hi, i reuploaded the following packages using a python2-pkgname naming scheme: -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37035 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22977 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29765 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19942 please delete the above packages. thx, -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: pysztaki
by György Balló 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Accidentally, I uploaded this package in wrong name, please delete it. The correct name is pysztaki-svn. Sorry. City-busz

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by speps 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Hi, can you please orphan libxml? ==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850 The maintainer seems to be inactive since May 2009 The are 3 comments suggesting the x86_64 addition, the last one on August 2010. Also, i need it to work for my libglade-old. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by Martti Kühne 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

hello http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=Synthead&SeB=m user owns 55 packages and has an invalid e-mail address. does anyone happen to know him (or is willing to google after him)? I wonder. he wouldn't get comment notifications, he wouldn't get ood bumps (afaik both go to that address) and he obviously doesn't get mail sent to his email address directly. I kindly ask for orphaning his dasm package in order to adopt it. regards mar77i ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:44 AM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: mysatyre(a)gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: synthead1(a)comcast.net Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 Not our Customer (state 14). ----- Original message ----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.185.79 with SMTP id cn15mr9556808vcb.54.1294713884783; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.139 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:44:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <AANLkTikDQKmXqrSe4QmKKrkGJg_z6i25FR7u7paxqEoy(a)mail.gmail.com> Subject: dasm version bump From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martti_K=C3=BChne?= <mysatyre(a)gmail.com> To: synthead1(a)comcast.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 http://sourceforge.net/projects/dasm-dillon/files/dasm-dillon/2.20.11/

2 2

Re: [aur-general] [Solved] aur bug let me can not update grub4dos
by Daniel Lin 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Sorry, I got a bug report response. And this issue is solved. Thank you.

1 0

[aur-general] aur bug let me can not update grub4dos
by Daniel Lin 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

I've post the bug near half year. Recently, I got a user require to renew PKGBUILD. But, I think this is bug of AUR script paring problem. As I know AUR's program will not modify. So, the simple method is delete the entry, let me upload again. If you know the admin of AUR, could you help me to delete the entry of grub4dos. That let me could easy upload a new grub4dos entry. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20672

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Thomas Dziedzic 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't >> think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved. > Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it) > > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup > I have edited the link [1] I am proposing this as more of an ultimatum to have 0 orphans by the end of this week. @gordonjcp "python-pyparallel - will adopt, Gordonjcp" still on the list... [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup#P…

2 5

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Huub Munstege 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Hi, no nothing, forget it. Just wanted to send a mail to Thomas directly. Saw afterwards it went to aur-general(a)archlinux.org. Sorry again. best regards ________________________________ Huub Munstege BPE 2836 Bamako, Rep. du Mali Tel: +223 20226397 Port: +223 78370695 ________________________________ ________________________________ From: Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> To: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 7:38:00 PM Subject: Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011. On Monday 10 January 2011 11:26:00 Huub Munstege wrote: > This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing, > as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then > be in community and be an orphan. Grass is maintained by Thomas and you already reported your problem on flyspray (FS#22379). So tell me what's the goal of this off topic. -- Andrea Insert mode

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Andrea Scarpino 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't > think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved. Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup -- Andrea

1 0

[aur-general] Does anyone use tdl?
by Kaiting Chen 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Just out of curiosity does anyone use tdl? The last release was way back in 2004. --Kaiting. [1]: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/tdl/ -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/

10 23