- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] removal request
by Grigorios Bouzakis 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3878 replaced by http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23827 -- Greg what to do and what not to do in public :o) http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php

3 5

[aur-general] Missing Packages
by aur-notify＠archlinux.org 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

Missing i686 Packages: No new package supplied for texlive-htmlxml-doc 2008.11913-1! No new package supplied for texlive-htmlxml-doc 2008.11913-1! -- This is an automated message. If you wish to stop receiving it twice a day, fix the package(s).

1 0

[aur-general] Missing Packages
by aur-notify＠archlinux.org 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Missing i686 Packages: No new package supplied for texlive-htmlxml-doc 2008.11913-1! Missing x86_64 Packages: No new package supplied for lrmi 0.10-1! -- This is an automated message. If you wish to stop receiving it twice a day, fix the package(s).

1 0

[aur-general] deletion request
by kludge 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

could someone delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21826? it's unnecessary. thanks! -kludge

2 1

[aur-general] Orphaning request
by Dr4g0* 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Could a TU please orphan the package hwinfo from user champus? The named application hasn't been updated for a year and there are some people interested in adopting the package hwinfo. Thanks in advance, Dr44go

2 1

[aur-general] What about gphotofs?
by Javier Vasquez 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Hi, I'm wondering why gphotfs was removed from AUR. Was it due to lack of users or lack of maintainers, or because what the packet provided is now provided by gphoto2 of libgphoto2? Just to find out whether I need my own version of gphotofs, or it's no longer needed, :). Thanks, -- Javier

1 1

[aur-general] package removal request
by Grigorios Bouzakis 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Can someone delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23763 ? Its the same as http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23750 . Use the second one if you want to. -- Greg what to do and what not to do in public :o) http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php

2 1

[aur-general] Dormant/outdated package eee-control
by Ben Davis 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Hi, I would like the AUR package eee-control at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22076 to be disowned in light of: a) The current maintainer has not actively maintained the package in almost 2 months b) I have posted an updated package and have been supporting a user outside of the AUR. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Cannot submit qtcreator
by Lukáš Jirkovský 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Hello, I can't submit new version of qtcreator package. After some time I got only empty webpage and nothing is updated. Does anybode know what can cause this? I've found out that it's usually caused by some mistake in PKGBUILD, but I'm sure that this PKGBUILD is OK.

3 2

[aur-general] Java SDK/Runtime dependencies
by Leslie P. Polzer 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Hello everyone, Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033 to this mailing list. Please help us find a consensus. My answer to his last question is: --- Let them install openjdk6 to provide the j2sdk dependency. It's not the Arch philosophy to cut on freedom of choice. By forcing a user to use either a free or proprietary alternative of a PROVIDES we ignore the purpose of this clause (i.e. providing freedom of choice). --- Moreover I don't really see what's controversial here. I'm a free software supporter myself, but I don't like forcing people to use it. provides=j2sdk is the way that will hurt no party. Thanks, Leslie -- LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer Xing Profile: https://www.xing.com/profile/LeslieP_Polzer Blog: http://blog.viridian-project.de/

7 16