- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] A small thank you
by Benjamin Andresen 17 Jan '09

17 Jan '09

Hello everyone, I just read this blog entry: http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/the-beauty-of-aur/ and thought: I need to say thank you, too. It's a nice product. So thanks to the AUR developers: BaSh, et al. And of course thanks to bfinch for getting the whole thing rolling. br, a happy AUR-user

1 0

Re: [aur-general] grub-gfx install failed
by goodmenzy＠gmail.com 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

On 2009-01-16 13:25:34, Allan McRae wrote: > goodmenzy(a)gmail.com wrote: >> It said : >> >> >> checking package integrity... >> (1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################################################] 100% >> error: could not prepare transaction >> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) >> grub-gfx: /usr/share/info/dir exists in filesystem >> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. >> > > File a bug report. > > Done, a bug report has been posted at http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12811?tasks=all&project=2

1 0

[aur-general] grub-gfx install failed
by goodmenzy＠gmail.com 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

It said : checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################################################] 100% error: could not prepare transaction error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) grub-gfx: /usr/share/info/dir exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of x86_64-specific and opera flashplugin packages
by Evangelos Foutras 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hello fellow TUs, I have come across people who picked a flashplugin package from the AUR over the one in [extra]. I feel that x86_64 flashplugin packages should be removed from the AUR now that the official one supports both architectures. Furthermore, Opera seems to get along just fine with flashplugin from [extra] so we don't need Opera-specific packages either. Packages in question are: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18096 (flashplayer-opera64) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21601 (flashplugin-alpha-64) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17442 (flashplugin-beta-opera) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18695 (flashplugin-mozilla, maintainer believes this should stay because "the official plugin doesn't have mms.cfg" - not sure what this is :>) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14074 (flashplugin-opera) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21607 (flashplugin-x86_64) From the above, I'd say that the following can be safely deleted: flashplayer-opera64 flashplugin-alpha-64 flashplugin-beta-opera flashplugin-opera flashplugin-x86_64 Any opinions on this? Do you think we should proceed with the removal of these packages in order to avoid confusion between them and flashplugin from [extra]?

2 2

[aur-general] opencv-cvs removing request
by Артем Смирнов 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hi, please remove package opencv-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1749, its replaced by opencv-svn. Thanks. -- Artyom

2 1

[aur-general] package removal request
by joyfulgirl＠archlinux.us 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hey all, Could someone remove cl-ppcre-clisp and stumpwm-clisp-git from the AUR? I've recently adopted the SBCL versions of both packages and made the PKGBUILDs able to work with both lisps. I've also given any users of the original packages about a month's notice of the pending deletion in the comments. Much appreciated! -- If I Ever Become An Evil Villainess... 224. I will build machines which simply fail when overloaded, rather than wiping out all nearby henchpeople in an explosion or setting off a chain reaction. I will do this by using devices known as "surge protectors."

2 2

[aur-general] packages to update
by Thomas SARBONI 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Hello all. Can somedody update these packages: -haxe -neko -editra -eclipse-pydev They are all flagged out to date from days (weeks ?) Thanks a lot. -- Thomas SARBONI April -promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre- Aujourd'hui, Lundi 12 Janvier 2009, il y a 3968 adhérents à l'April. Et vous, où en êtes vous ? http://www.april.org/adherer?referent=Thomas%20SARBONI+(tsarboni)

4 4

[aur-general] Removal of f2c
by Michele Mocciola 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

I created f2c package in the last days (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23047) but after having installed I saw it's not compatible with gfortran (it's fully compatible only with g77 that isn't supported by Archlinux). So I think it can be safely removed. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphans packages list
by Andrea Scarpino 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Hi TUs, now that I'm a DEV I'll help Pierre with KDE maintenance, so I prefer to have not packages who needs some Gnome depends to give all myself to KDE. This is the list of packages who I orphaned: * alexandria (if you want you can adopt all ruby-* packages who are required by alexandria) * awn-extras-applets * elisa-base ** elisa-plugins ** pigment ** python-cssutils ** python-pigment ** twisted-web2 ** xdg-user-dirs * gnuconcept ** diacanvas * gtk2_prefs * screenlets * sensors-applet * soundconverter * striim There are others orphans packages in community: * gputils (required by ktechlab [sergej]) * libxml-perl * mhwaveedit * portaudio (required by espeak [partition]) * portaudio_cpp (required by portaudio) * python-jinja (required by python-sphinx [dsa]) * rutilt * shapelib (required by gen2shp and gpsmanshp [dtw]) * vamps * xgl Regards -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

3 3

[aur-general] Removal of Bogus package.
by KalasMannen 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Hi! Can anyone help me remove a bogus package i accidentily uploaded to the AUR? It's located at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22825, and is basiclly just an upload of the official kernel26 PKGBUILD from svn. Would be greatly appreciated! /Magnus

2 1