- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Oct '15

14 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] TU application: Pierre Neidhardt
by Pierre Neidhardt 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Hi! My name is Pierre Neidhardt. I am sending my TU application under the sponsor of Alexander F Rødseth (xyproto). (Thanks again, Alexander.) Before going on with the geekiness, a few things about me: my hobbies include cinema, reading & watching stuff on psychology and education, as well as quitting my job + moving out + travelling to another country every two years. I am a computer scientist. I am deeply interested in algorithms, languages and operating systems, but my main field remains computer graphics. I have worked in research and briefly for the video game industry. I am working / planning on getting games and engines running on Unices. I am also a little active in the Wine project and on AppDB. I have been dealing with many different flavours of Unices for several years now. My preference goes to KISS / fundamental Unices, such as Gentoo, FreeBSD, or, surprisingly, Arch :D I love the robustness and the scientific approach of these distributions and their philosophy. (I have deep respect for the dreadful <http://cat-v.org>. :p) I am fond of programming languages created with a technically simple and elegant design in mind. I am thinking of C, Lua and the younger Go. I've contributed to numerous open-source projects (dwb, Emacs, Mutt, ranger...), since I strongly endorse the opinion that upstream should be fixed first ;) I have created and maintained a few programs. One of them is demlo[1], a (very) dynamic and extensible music organizer. (Currently broken with Lua 5.3 because of an unported dependency... Will fix soon!) I also used to be a TeX and LaTeX guru and I contributed to a major part of the LaTeX Wikibook[2]. (Beside new content, I helped for a massive re-organization, structure and progression clarification, duplicates removal and pointer use.) Regarding Arch, I have maintained a few dozen AUR packages[3] in the last few years. (Some of which I have disowned out of a lack of interest.) Other contributions include numerous Wiki edits[4] (Cups, Emacs, Mutt, wifi), a few bug reports (everybody knows Arch has no bugs :p), some forum strolling and some documentation / patches around makepkg & co[5][6]. I have recently been working with Alexander on overhauling the Go package[7]: correct dependencies, strip binaries, update cleanup, set up cross-compilation tool-chain properly and remove unneeded binaries. This gave me even more motivation than before to become a TU. I have subsequently asked Alexander to endorse my TU application. My focus is on Go packages, other CLI applications, Lua libraries and video games. I might consider packaging Go programs such as gur, camlistore, gotsync, oh, fnd, tabby, to name a few. The `go` compiler enforces static building (rationale: [8]), which often results in packages with no dependencies at all. (The `go` package itself has none!) This makes packaging even more relevant, as the requirements for building the package are much higher than for installing the result. AUR packages that I would like to maintain in community include clyrics, docx2txt, tespeed, textadept, uncrustify, translate, trash-cli. Thank you and happy voting! Cheers! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.bitbucket.org [1]: https://ambrevar.bitbucket.org/demlo/ [2]: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Ambrevar [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=Ambrevar [4]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Ambrevar [5]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2014-February/018807.html [6]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2014-March/018851.html [7]: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packag… [8]: http://port70.net/~nsz/32_dynlink.html

9 13

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (i686) * thrift-0.9.3-1 (i686) * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (x86_64) * thrift-0.9.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * thrift-0.9.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * thrift-0.9.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 5 signoffs 2. eworm - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) == * eclib-20150827-1 (i686) * flint-2.5.2-2 (i686) * linbox-1.3.2-6 (i686) * ntl-9.4.0-1 (i686) * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (i686) * sagemath-6.9-1 (i686) * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (i686) * eclib-20150827-1 (x86_64) * flint-2.5.2-2 (x86_64) * linbox-1.3.2-6 (x86_64) * ntl-9.4.0-1 (x86_64) * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (x86_64) * sagemath-6.9-1 (x86_64) * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (x86_64) * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (i686) * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * eclib-20150827-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flint-2.5.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * linbox-1.3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntl-9.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * eclib-20150827-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flint-2.5.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * linbox-1.3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ntl-9.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Oct '15

11 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 8 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Oct '15

10 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Oct '15

09 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * libev-4.20-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libev-4.20-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 2 signoffs 2. spupykin - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Half Deleted Package?
by Niccolò Maggioni 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

I created the package just before the AUR4 transition, but it somehow got lost during the upgrade. I'll try to delete any leftover, I'll report back in a few hours! Il giorno gio 8 ott 2015 04:12 David Manouchehri <manouchehri(a)riseup.net> ha scritto: > I search in the AUR for pam_u2f-git and nothing came up. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_u2f-git/ > > So I wrote my own package > (https://github.com/Manouchehri/AUR-pam_u2f-git/blob/master/PKGBUILD) > and went to push it... and got denied. Turns out it does exist! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=pam_u2f-git > > Any idea what's going on here? >

3 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 27 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * vtk-6.3.0-2 (i686) * vtk-6.3.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * almanah-0.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.2.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-boxes-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-initial-setup-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-software-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libev-4.20-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * notification-daemon-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * simple-scan-3.18.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * valabind-0.9.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.2.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-boxes-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-initial-setup-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-software-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libev-4.20-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * notification-daemon-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.18.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * valabind-0.9.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * nemiver-0.9.6-1 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Half Deleted Package?
by David Manouchehri 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

I searched in the AUR for pam_u2f-git and nothing came up. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam_u2f-git/ So I wrote my own package (https://github.com/Manouchehri/AUR-pam_u2f-git/blob/master/PKGBUILD) and went to push it... and got denied. Turns out it does exist! https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=pam_u2f-git Any idea what's going on here?

4 3