- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Feb '16

07 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * darktable-2.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-7.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-2.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-7.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686), since 2016-01-22 * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64), since 2016-01-22 * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686), since 2016-01-23 * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64), since 2016-01-23 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Feb '16

06 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * vtk-7.0.0-1 (i686) * vtk-7.0.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * darktable-2.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-7.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-2.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-7.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686), since 2016-01-22 * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64), since 2016-01-22 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 2. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR package deletion request: keybase-staging and keybase-release
by Jack O'Connor 06 Feb '16

06 Feb '16

Now that the "keybase" package is in community, can we delete these old AUR packages? Thanks, Jack

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD review
by Ryan Whited 05 Feb '16

05 Feb '16

Couldn't figure out how to reply from digest (turned that off now) so I guess I'm starting a new thread. I've completely overhauled the PKGBUILD taking in critiques that I've received and some things I've learned on my own. As before, you can view the PKGBUILD at https://github.com/godofgrunts/arch-PKGBUILDs/blob/master/godot-export # Maintainer: Ryan Whited <dergottdergrunten at gmail dot com> @god_of_grunts pkgname=godot-export _rname=godot pkgver=1.1 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Export templates for the stable release of the Godot engine 1.1" url="http://www.godotengine.org" license=('MIT') arch=('i686' 'x86_64') makedepends=('scons' 'mingw-w64-binutils' 'mingw-w64-crt' 'mingw-w64-gcc' 'mingw-w64-headers' 'mingw-w64-headers-bootstrap' 'mingw-w64-winpthreads' 'upx') #'emscripten' depends=('glu' 'libxcursor' 'alsa-lib' 'freetype2' 'mesa') optdepends=('godot: Cannot export without it') conflicts=('godot-export-git' 'godot-git') install=$pkgname.install _arch='' if test "$CARCH" == x86_64; then _arch=('64') else _arch=('32') fi source=("https://github.com/godotengine/godot/archive/${pkgver}-stable.tar.gz") md5sums=('87eb2fc3518ce7a27957fada1ba003e9') build() { export MINGW64_PREFIX="x86_64-w64-mingw32-" export MINGW32_PREFIX="i686-w64-mingw32-" #export EMSCRIPTEN_ROOT=/usr/lib/emscripten cores=$(nproc) cd "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable #linux if test _arch == '32'; then scons -j $cores platform=x11 tools=no target=release bits=32 #linux_x11_32_release scons -j $cores platform=x11 tools=no target=release_debug bits=32 #linux_x11_32_debug else scons -j $cores platform=x11 tools=no target=release bits=64 #linux_x11_64_release scons -j $cores platform=x11 tools=no target=release_debug bits=64 #linux_x11_64_debug fi #linux-server if test _arch == '32'; then scons -j $cores platform=server target=release_debug tools=no bits=32 else scons -j $cores platform=server target=release_debug tools=no bits=64 fi #Windows export MINGW32_PREFIX="i686-w64-mingw32-" export MINGW64_PREFIX="x86_64-w64-mingw32-" scons -j $cores platform=windows tools=no target=release bits=32 #windows_32_release.exe scons -j $cores platform=windows tools=no target=release_debug bits=32 #windows_32_debug.exe scons -j $cores platform=windows tools=no target=release bits=64 #windows_64_release.exe scons -j $cores platform=windows tools=no target=release_debug bits=64 #windows_64_debug.exe #OS X #I'll put code here when https://github.com/godotengine/godot/wiki/compiling_osx is updated #Android #Probably should do this yourself, I'm not about to mess with your Android SDK #https://github.com/godotengine/godot/wiki/export_android #WinRT #Can't do this on Linux sorry #Blackberry 10 #Currently disabled by Godot #HTML5 #Currently broken per https://github.com/godotengine/godot/issues/3510 #scons -j $cores platform=javascript tools=no target=release #scons -j $cores platform=javascript tools=no target=release_debug } package() { install -D -m644 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/LICENSE.md "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${_rname}/LICENSE" #Linux if test _arch == '32'; then install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.x11.opt.32 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_32_release install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.x11.opt.debug.32 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_32_debug upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_32_release upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_32_debug else install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.x11.opt.64 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_64_release install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.x11.opt.debug.64 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_64_debug upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_64_release upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_x11_64_debug fi #Linux Server if test _arch == '32'; then install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot_server.server.opt.debug.32 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_server_32 upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_server_32 else install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot_server.server.opt.debug.64 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_server_64 upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/linux_server_64 fi #Windows install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.windows.opt.64.exe ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_64_release.exe install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.windows.opt.debug.64.exe ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_64_debug.exe install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.windows.opt.32.exe ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_32_release.exe install -D -m755 "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.windows.opt.debug.32.exe ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_32_debug.exe upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_32_debug.exe upx ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_32_release.exe x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_64_release.exe x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/windows_64_debug.exe #HTML5 #cp "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.javascript.opt.html "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.html #cp "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.javascript.opt.js "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.js #cp "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/tools/html_fs/filesystem.js "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/filesystem.js #zip ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/javascript_release.zip "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.html "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.js "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/filesystem.js #cp "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.javascript.opt.debug.html "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.html #cp "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.javascript.opt.debug.js "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.js #zip ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/godot/javascript_debug.zip "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.html "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/godot.js "${srcdir}"/${_rname}-${pkgver}-stable/bin/filesystem.js } -- Thank you, Ryan Whited

4 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Feb '16

05 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * darktable-2.1.0-3 (i686) * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (i686) * jack2-1.9.10-4 (i686) * mldonkey-3.1.5-7 (i686) * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (i686) * darktable-2.1.0-3 (x86_64) * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (x86_64) * jack2-1.9.10-4 (x86_64) * mldonkey-3.1.5-7 (x86_64) * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * darktable-2.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-2.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0_git20160107-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 2 signoffs 2. ambrevar - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Feb '16

04 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 13 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * pcurses-4-5 (i686) * pcurses-4-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * python-colorama-0.3.6-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * shadowsocks-2.8.2.20160112-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * go-2:1.5.3-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pcurses-4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * go-2:1.5.3-3 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. arodseth - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. ambrevar - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Feb '16

03 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * go-2:1.5.3-3 (i686) * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) * go-2:1.5.3-3 (x86_64) * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * python-colorama-0.3.6-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * shadowsocks-2.8.2.20160112-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * go-2:1.5.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * go-2:1.5.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mythplugins-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eworm - 1 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored.
by Edward Torvalds 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

I am not able to install any package using 'yaourt' (although I can using pacman). No matter what package I try to install I end up with same error again and again, and it asks me to rebuild that package again. Error: ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored. I tried to fix this error by live booting Arch Linux and reinstalling my base again but it did not help: pacstrap -cG /path/to/my/root base base-devel --force Please suggest how to fix this error. Please ask for any more information you need about my system. I am using latest version of Arch Linux 64 bit. I have fakeroot, base- devel packages installed. Thanks -- Edward Torvalds <ltorvalds024(a)gmail.com>

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 25 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 31 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (25 total) == * android-udev-20160129-1 (any) * acpi_call-1.1.0-39 (i686) * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-26 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-41 (i686) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-15 (i686) * r8168-8.041.00-4 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.041.00-2 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-4 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-78 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-46 (i686) * vhba-module-20140928-22 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-5.0.14-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.14-2 (i686) * acpi_call-1.1.0-39 (x86_64) * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-26 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.8-41 (x86_64) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-15 (x86_64) * r8168-8.041.00-4 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.041.00-2 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-4 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-78 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-46 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20140928-22 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-5.0.14-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.14-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * android-udev-20160129-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-colorama-0.3.6-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * shadowsocks-2.8.2.20160112-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.041.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-78 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-46 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.14-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-2.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * postgis-2.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.041.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-78 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-46 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.14-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eworm - 1 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Question About firefox-gtk2-bin
by Mark Weiman 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

I noticed a package on the AUR (firefox-gtk2-bin) that appears to download a binary copy of Firefox that doesn't come from Mozilla. It comes from someone's GitHub account instead. I was looking through the Wiki about whether or not there's something in the guidelines for the AUR or just the packaging standards on whether this is something that is acceptable, but I cannot find anything regarding this. I suspect the package firefox-gtk2-bin exists because firefox-gtk2 takes a while to build. My question is if whether packages of this nature are okay for the AUR or if it's not. Mark Weiman

1 0