- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] How to remove package?
by Felix E. Klee 12 Nov '15

12 Nov '15

I accidentally uploaded a package (formerly in AUR3) without the `-git` postfix: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vncdesk> The package has since been superseded by the correctly named: <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vncdesk-git> How do I delete vncdesk?

4 5

[aur-general] PKGBUILD for touchcontrol-android
by Jens Heyens 12 Nov '15

12 Nov '15

Dear AUR users, I wrote a PKGBUILD for "TouchControl For Android" (https://github.com/ternes3/TouchControl-for-Android) and I think this might be useful to others. Since this is my first one to publish I would like some advice/corrections for it before I am going to publish it. Cheers Jens Heyens

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Nov '15

12 Nov '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmind-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 19 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (19 total) == * bluegriffon-1.7.2-4 (i686) * ffmpeg-compat-1:0.10.16-4 (i686) * mediastreamer-2.12.0-2 (i686) * mythtv-1:0.27.5-3 (i686) * seamonkey-2.38-2 (i686) * toxcore-3645-1 (i686) * virtualbox-5.0.8-2 (i686) * xmind-3.6.0-1 (i686) * xulrunner-41.0.2-2 (i686) * bluegriffon-1.7.2-4 (x86_64) * ffmpeg-compat-1:0.10.16-4 (x86_64) * hhvm-3.10.1-3 (x86_64) * mediastreamer-2.12.0-2 (x86_64) * mythtv-1:0.27.5-3 (x86_64) * seamonkey-2.38-2 (x86_64) * toxcore-3645-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-5.0.8-2 (x86_64) * xmind-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) * xulrunner-41.0.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (33 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-1.7.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ffmpeg-compat-1:0.10.16-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mediastreamer-2.12.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * seamonkey-2.38-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * toxcore-3645-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-5.0.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xulrunner-41.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-1.7.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ffmpeg-compat-1:0.10.16-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hhvm-3.10.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mediastreamer-2.12.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mythtv-1:0.27.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * seamonkey-2.38-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * toxcore-3645-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-5.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmind-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xulrunner-41.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Aur missing email notifications
by Leonidas Spyropoulos 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Hello, I've noticed that I'm missing some notifications from AUR. Specifically a comment at package linux-ck [1] made from "vishwin" on "2015-11-10 00:24". Last time something like that happened it was due to to a downtime anounced at news [2]. Anyone noticed something similar? Cheers [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-ck/ [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/news/downtime-rsync-mail/ -- Leonidas Spyropoulos Compiled in Vim, sent through mutt.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eworm - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-tornado-4.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-tornado-4.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Problem with opustags PKGBUILD
by Storm Dragon 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

Howdy, I put together a PKGBUILD for opustags, a cli tagger for opus files. I am pretty sure I did it right, but I get the error "/bin exists in file system" when installing the package. So, I guess I am missing something completely obvious lol. The PKGBUILD is attached. Thanks for any help Storm -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Twitter and Facebook are so ... yesteryear. Get your 2MB Social account TODAY! http://2mb.social/main/register My Blackberry is Broken: http://is.gd/my_blackberry_is_broken "Every day is Halloween" Type O Negative - Black No. One

2 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Nov '15

08 Nov '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * subsurface-4.5.2-1 (i686) * subsurface-libdc-4.5.2-1 (i686) * subsurface-marble-4.5.2-1 (i686) * subsurface-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) * subsurface-libdc-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) * subsurface-marble-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-tornado-4.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-4.5.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-libdc-4.5.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-marble-4.5.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-tornado-4.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-libdc-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-marble-4.5.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] How to install dependency that is in AUR
by Ole Jon Bjørkum 07 Nov '15

07 Nov '15

Hi. What is the correct way to install a dependency if the dependency package is in AUR? Can I do it in the .install file? Regards, Ole Jon

15 31