- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * opencl-headers-2:1.2.20150123-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686), since 2015-05-15 * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64), since 2015-05-15 * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686), since 2015-05-25 * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64), since 2015-05-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] My AUR4 migration workflow
by Johannes Dewender 14 Jun '15

14 Jun '15

> > > Generate .SRCINFO for all packages: > > > > > > $ while read p; do git -C "$p" filter-branch -f --tree-filter > > > "test -f .SRCINFO || mksrcinfo"; done < ../pkgs > > > > Don't do it like that. This creates a .SRCINFO from the first > > PKGBUILD of the package and doesn't update the file for later > > commits anymore. > > So your .SRCINFO is outdated in all following commits. > > > > The problem was in one of the scripts linked in the wiki > > but is fixed there, too. > > > > So don't test for .SRCINFO, *always* run mksrcinfo. > > Hmm. Instinctively I'd have agreed, but I can't reproduce this. > > I think git filter-branch actually checks out each "vanilla" commit > from the original branch to apply the given changes, and doesn't base > them on the already-changed commits. I actually didn't know that and it does sound very weird. If the next commit is not based on the previous commit this can potentially "revert" the change made in the previous commit. Although it is difficult to construct a case where this is a problem. (like checking if the commit is the root and only making the change in that case) Thanks for the tests and information. I didn't test this myself, but I was sure just running mksrcinfo works as expected and I was afraid that checking for the file can be *very* wrong. And like mentioned, I was pretty sure filter-branch had to work like I imagined. Like Eli said: There is also no need for the test. mksrcinfo is fairly lightweight (only getting info from PKGBUILD) and doesn't build the whole package or similar. (which is probably the other fear that makes people test for .SRCINFO before creating it) -- JonnyJD

2 1

[aur-general] Multiple maintainers
by Pablo Lezaeta Reyes 14 Jun '15

14 Jun '15

I try add "maandree" to comaintain my "ponysay-devel-git", I fill the request and press accept but no "comaintainer update" or message is show and I not see he in the list. Is there a pedior to wait? the co maintainer need to accept the request? how I know the request was send or rejected? this intended behavoid (or whatever the ortography)? how co-maintainership requests is handled in the aurweb scripting? -- *Pablo Lezaeta*

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Jun '15

14 Jun '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * opencl-headers-2:1.2.20150123-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.1-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.1-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686), since 2015-05-15 * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64), since 2015-05-15 * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686), since 2015-05-25 * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64), since 2015-05-25 * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (i686), since 2015-05-30 * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (x86_64), since 2015-05-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 6 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR4 feature request
by Ralf Mardorf 14 Jun '15

14 Jun '15

Hi, it would be nice if users could subscribe to packages, to receive information before a package gets deleted. I noticed that a PKGBUILD I used disappeared, before I could store the PKGBUILD on my machine. $ pacman -Qi libfm-gtk-git Name : libfm-gtk-git Version : 1.2.3.43.gc8ff3c2-1 Build Date : Mon 25 May 2015 04:12:52 AM CEST It's neither provided by the old, nor by the new AUR. I never downloaded the PKGBUILD, since I build with yaourt. To avoid such unpleasant surprises in the future, it would be nice if users could receive information about delete requests, when they are subscribe to a package. Regards, Ralf

4 7

[aur-general] Password sent every month ?
by Félix Piédallu 14 Jun '15

14 Jun '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi there ! Just new here. And I've been informed that "Normally, Mailman will remind you of your archlinux.org mailing list passwords once every month". Does it mean the passwords are saved somewhere ?! That means that my password is sent periodically. That's not the only account for which I use this password. That is a HUGE security breach. Please, change that system. And by the way, hello there, fellow arch users and devs ;) - -- Félix Piédallu Président du Club Robotronik Phelma 06 51 41 32 48 Manjaro Linux. Feel the freedom. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVfGubAAoJEMJ1NtNxTzOfpKAP/RQqFT5XentDJooLJ3FghKaO 15p0ij0MPx68DrLnfiUHqCqUR2yZ1r5Xt0EUel4giwGZQfd7wKnTlLp7jfc6TCp8 eQlFGZucLzCqu383aCJBjxnwJPz51O+ZDPuhxddhrYQ1hz4jV89h6TpVaqLWuGhd OZtT9uIx7es5iClmx7FG6fh1Kn4Rqzx5Nj2jshCzNaVqBcXrZK4c6NJZIpJQx05f kw4uuFA8pgYU8mCsG2aohrd1fpVJgjHpzLESgZo7d2xvAi3ERzYRUnU0UaPcI31F bHwjNIvG7glpLL4eB+GEZEouK0Ug4fJ/0Jd5e0heyxfD34a5FqhB41d8xQg6i5CC Cj+W/JrT0WqDigsN54wKd9xWmZUg929quL7TXkj3oZyQMb6bYEDdJA05i38MUmnk II424mJHm1ShPTNyCQRqjXqYdZDE+d4mg39Oi3m9AWWFY0DIRNa1HdBrLnjNJROG jMsZ6LXrVMbJHYfvI621S3RuS4TXwbh6foNfSplY3V6WAyfxsdNoRIRMviWQ+QEQ 9Z0ALDNfm/sZ+Vgah+HDwfdRuO7+WVD7nBsi4hJh2/z9UnorNCtuJ2qYiFxr5hnN IzrxIrRfDwWAFzFDztAQ263andFAefa0EewOTzhk68Fqu7xXRx68uvzrltUWmQfx l4QQpZGFfznSkMdOOCtP =tDPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 7

[aur-general] [AUR/bzr-gtk] 'CHKInventoryRepository' object has no attribute
by Nicolas Planel 13 Jun '15

13 Jun '15

Hi, As this package didn't have a maintainer, I report you the bug to this mailing list, feel free to forward it to the right destination. Basically a deprecated, already fixed mainstream bug are current in the package bzr-gtk 0.100.0-2 Short backtrace : File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/gtk/commit.py", line 874, in save_commit_messages revid_iterator = b.repository.iter_reverse_revision_history(old_revid) AttributeError: 'CHKInventoryRepository' object has no attribute 'iter_reverse_revision_history' Full bug report : https://bugs.launchpad.net/archlinux/+source/bzr-gtk/+bug/1464784 Fixup patch attached Regards, Nicolas PLANEL

3 4

[aur-general] registration with wrong email
by respiranto 13 Jun '15

13 Jun '15

Hi, Some days ago, I wanted to register an AUR account but unfortunately used the wrong email address (respiranto(a)icloud.de instead of .com). Since the mail with the password has been sent to the wrong email adress (which is probably not existing), I am not able to change the email-adress nor to delete the account to create a new one with the desired username respiranto. Is it possible, that somebody who has the right to do so, deletes the current account connected to respiranto((a)icloud.de)? It would probably be best to do this after sending a mail to the current mail (.de) and waiting a week or so, so you can be sure it was actually me, who created the account.

2 1

[aur-general] Category... and AUR4
by Pablo Lezaeta Reyes 13 Jun '15

13 Jun '15

As discuced countless times, there is a recurrent request to remove Category because is not acurated to the many catoegories that a package could have, is not a translatable part, always there are miscategoriced packages, and so on (even there is a few bugs to improbe and to remove it) the list is long if you read the thread across the years. Now with AUR4, this camp finaly will be updated to reflect a propper categorization (maybe imtating the availabe categories in Debian or Ubuntu) and make it translatable or will be dropped finally for joy of some and sad of others? also "Learn more" is not tranlatable string in the fromnt page. -- *Pablo Lezaeta*

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Jun '15

13 Jun '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * opencl-headers-2:1.2.20150123-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.1-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.1-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686), since 2015-05-15 * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (x86_64), since 2015-05-15 * python2-systemd-220-1 (i686), since 2015-05-25 * python2-systemd-220-1 (x86_64), since 2015-05-25 * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (i686), since 2015-05-30 * shairport-sync-2.2.4-1 (x86_64), since 2015-05-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 5 signoffs 3. eworm - 4 signoffs

1 0