- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] AUR4 keywords in PKGBUILD?
by Ido Rosen 18 Jul '15

18 Jul '15

Is it possible currently to set the keywords/tags in the PKGBUILD itself instead of on the website? (Previously, we had to set categories on the AUR website, but that felt suboptimal.) e.g. a keywords=('cats' 'dogs' ...); variable? Or, alternatively, would people be amenable to adding an ssh command in the AUR git-shell to add/remove/set keywords?

5 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Jul '15

17 Jul '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * arm-none-eabi-gcc-5.2.0-1 (i686) * arm-none-eabi-gcc-5.2.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * arm-none-eabi-gcc-5.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-gcc-5.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 5 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Jul '15

16 Jul '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 46 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (46 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Doubts about Java {,bindings} packages
by Giovanni Santini 15 Jul '15

15 Jul '15

Hello everybody, I just wanted to share some doubts about some packages cointaining Java libraries. As I noticed that some official packages that usually ships Java libraries upstream (for binding or common usage) haven't such files in official PKGBUILDs/packages, I had to edit the official PKGBUILD in order to build also Java files. The actual packages I'm referring to are opencv[1] and gettext[2], for which I've created {opencv,gettext}-java (see [3],[4]). My doubts are the following: - As my packages are just some files that are missed from the official packages because of a missing 'java-environment' makedependency, should I open an issue in the bug tracker asking for the addition of the Java libraries? - Is it fine to host some files on AUR packages that are expected to be in the official packages? - Actually, for splitting already present packages and Java ones (the ones that aren't in official packages), I made a really simple but dirty thing; I made that 'make install' put files in '$srcdir/temp' and then I copy the files I need with a 'cp /path/to/file $pkgdir/path/in/os/to/file'. I tried creating a directory with something like 'mktemp -d -p $srcdir' but during package(), every temporary directory variable (made with 'tmpdir=$(mktemp -d -p $srcdir)') is lost and I can't create any directory (because we are in the fakeroot environment). I have no ideas for making this in a cleaner way, so I hope it is fine to do so; if someone has some suggestions, please tell me. TL;DR Should I ask to add this libraries in official packages or doing my AUR packages? References: [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=opencv [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=gettext [3] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/opencv-java/ [4] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/gettext-java/ Greetings -- Giovanni Santini My blog: http://giovannisantini.tk My code: https://github.com/ItachiSan My GPG: 2FADEBF5

2 2

[aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR
by Andrejs Mivreņiks 15 Jul '15

15 Jul '15

Hi, The user instmania[1] has posted spam links in the comments section of almost every recently updated package. For example [2] [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/instmania/ [2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/warthunder/ -- Andrejs Mivreņiks PGP Key Fingerprint: 3872 5DEB BCA5 9460 09B2 E867 F34B C7DA D782 DAB8

13 16

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Jul '15

15 Jul '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 32 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 46 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (32 total) == * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (i686) * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (i686) * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (x86_64) * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (x86_64) * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (46 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-libpinyin-1.7.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-1.1.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 11 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] forgot the username for my AUR account
by Dennis Værum 14 Jul '15

14 Jul '15

the account is registered under this mail and I can get a link to reset the accounts password, but I still need the username. Can someone send the username to this mail?

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Jul '15

14 Jul '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kadu-2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kadu-2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] blacklisted package
by Eduardo Machado 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

hi, i tried to create a new package, and when i tryed to push it to the server i received a message that it is blacklisted. what happened? This was what i did: $git push origin master Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 1.05 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: error: package is blacklisted: python2-passlib remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To ssh+git://aur4.archlinux.org/python-passlib.git/ ! [remote rejected] master -> master (hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh+git:// aur4.archlinux.org/python-passlib.git/' --- Eduardo M. Machado

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * salt-2015.5.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kadu-2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kadu-2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-71 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.28-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 4 signoffs 2. eworm - 1 signoffs 3. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0