- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3
by Jerome Leclanche 27 Feb '14

27 Feb '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ Appears to be the same packaged data as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out how to make it build. J. Leclanche

5 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Feb '14

27 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * gitg-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gitg-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. dreisner - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge pms-git into np1-mps-git
by Johannes Löthberg 27 Feb '14

27 Feb '14

Hey, I'd like to request for pms-git[1] to be merged into np1-mps-git[2] due to upstream rename. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pms-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/np1-mps-git/ -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5

2 1

[aur-general] delete request mingw-w64-testsuite
by xantares 09 27 Feb '14

27 Feb '14

hi, could my package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-testsuite/ it's more a test package than an actual package. xan.

2 1

[aur-general] rc candidates
by Aaron Mueller 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

Hi! I maintain some AUR packages and I am in doubt if I should update packages on rc candidates. In my special case, the package "worker" is on the stable version 3.3.0. This is the version which is linked on the website. But today the author announce the version 3.3.3rc1 and uploaded it. Should I update the package immediately to 3.3.3rc1 or should I wait for the 3.3.3 version? Best, Aaron

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * gitg-0.3.2-1 (i686) * gitg-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * gitg-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gitg-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] disown haskell-void
by Alexej Magura 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

package name: haskell-void package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-void/ Package doesn't build and the maintainer hasn't responded to AUR comments.

3 3

[aur-general] Plymouth packaging suggestions requested from TUs
by Padfoot 25 Feb '14

25 Feb '14

Hi, I am the current maintainer of the AUR packages: plymouth-release https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plymouth-release/ plymouth-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plymouth-git/ plymouth-release is at version 0.8.8 on http://www.freedesktop.org/software/plymouth/releases/ and is working plymouth-git at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/cgit/plymouth/ is currently broken While investigation the plymouth-git breakage, I found source for plymouth-0.8.9 in Fedora Rawhide nightlies. 0.8.9 builds and works correctly, but as it is from the Fedora Rawhide nightlies, the source is subject to frequent changes. I am seeking suggestions of what I could/could not should/should not do with the 0.8.9 package. I could update plymouth-release to this package, but it is not an "official" release. I could temporarily replace plymouth-git with this package until git is working, but it's not really a git source. I could upload a new plymouth-rawhide package, but I don't want to spam the AUR with yet another version unnecessarily. FInally I could just do nothing and wait until the "official" update to the source on http://www.freedesktop.org/software/plymouth/releases/ Bear in mind, as the sources are from Fedora Rawhide nightlies, I have embeded the source archive in the package to prevent breakage from frequent updates. The package size including the source is 1.2MB. Of course, I would like to share this updated (as of Feb 2014) source with the Arch community, but under the circumstances, I think advice on how to proceed from the TUs is warranted. Thanks. Lachlan.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Feb '14

25 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 4 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal Request] nodejs-yapp.js
by Andy Weidenbaum 25 Feb '14

25 Feb '14

Upstream source is no longer available. Please remove this package<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-yapp.js/> . Thanks, Andy

2 1