- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Disown Request
by David J. Haines 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Please disown yeganesh so that I can pick it up. I contacted the maintainer via e-mail two weeks ago, to no response. Here's the link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yeganesh/ Thanks! -- David J. Haines djhaines(a)gmx.com 0xAFB3D16D - F929 270F B7C3 78AE A741 434F A7C6 F264 AFB3 D16C

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi
by Lucy hi 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/ I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this package is no longer useful.

2 1

[aur-general] Not interested in maintaining gnash anymore
by Jan Alexander Steffens 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Is anyone interested in taking it from my hands? ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Von: "Community Packages" <bugs(a)archlinux.org> Datum: 24.02.2014 17:23 Betreff: FS#39000: [gnash-gtk] Needs rebuilt against new version of boost An: <bugs(a)archlinux.org> Cc: THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has been changed. The changes are listed below. For full information about what has changed, visit the URL and click the History tab. FS#39000 - [gnash-gtk] Needs rebuilt against new version of boost User who did this: Doug Newgard (Scimmia) Architecture: All -> i686 Status: Waiting on Response -> Assigned Severity: Low -> High Assigned To: [-] -> Jan Steffens More information can be found at the following URL: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39000 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[aur-general] Package with arch-depending source
by Ismael Bouya 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Hi, I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is "arch-depending" (anaconda) For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the source/md5 array and adding a if [ "$CARCH" == "i686" ] (...) just after to modify it. Is that the usual way to do that? Or how should it be done? I see no information about that in the AUR guidelines. -- Ismael

2 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * exim-4.82-2 (i686), since 2014-02-06 * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64), since 2014-02-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 8 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 5 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 2 signoffs 5. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3
by Jeremy Audet 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and a duplicate of python-pylint [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-pylint/ --Jeremy

2 1

Re: [aur-general] removal request: girlfriend
by mail＠bebna.de 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Can I have it?

1 0

[aur-general] removal request: girlfriend
by Doug Newgard 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

Someone uploaded a joke package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/girlfriend/ Doug

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Evan Teitelman 24 Feb '14

24 Feb '14

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Feb '14

23 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * exim-4.82-2 (i686), since 2014-02-06 * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64), since 2014-02-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs 2. djgera - 3 signoffs

1 0