- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Orphan or delete request: python2-postfix-policyd-spf
by Rich Li 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, The 'python2-postfix-policyd-spf' package [1] has been flagged out of date since 2012-02-28 and hasn't been updated since 2011-01-20. I've updated the PKGBUILD for a newer version (albeit not the current version) and posted the diff in the comments, but the maintainer has not responded. I would request for this package to be orphaned so I can bring it up-to-date and maintain it, but the 'python-postfix-policyd-spf' package [2] looks to be a well-maintained version that uses Python 3 instead of Python 2. If there's value in keeping a Python 2 version around, then I request the package be orphaned, but if there's not, then I suggest the package be deleted in favor of [2]. Personally, I vote for deletion. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-postfix-policyd-spf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-postfix-policyd-spf/ Thanks, -- Rich

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: python-h5py
by Rich Li 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, I'm requesting for the 'python-h5py' package [1] to be orphaned so I can take over as maintainer. It's been flagged out of date since 2013-06-14. I've created an updated PKGBUILD and posted it in the package comments a few weeks ago, but there has been no response from the current maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-h5py/ Thanks, -- Rich

2 1

[aur-general] disown request: fplll
by xantares 09 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hello, The package fplll is not updated since 6 months, maintainer is inactive https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfplll/ Regards,

2 2

[aur-general] Please Review: mock-git: Mock takes an SRPM and builds RPM packages from it in a chroot
by Peter Littmann 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

I just uploaded this tool and please you to send me your comments about the included PKGBUILD. Will this be okay in this form or should it better be improved and what? The check runs for a while but then ended with failures but I think these are somewhere in Enterprise Linux cause the fedora seems not to be a problem. Thanks a lot for all your works in AUR.

2 1

[aur-general] libftdi merge request
by xantares 09 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, Could mingw-w64-libftdi1 be renamed to mingw-w64-libftdi https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libftdi1/ That way it'll be consistent with the renaming in extra repo: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libftdi/ Regards, xan.

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (i686) * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-tornado-3.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-chewing-1.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-tornado-3.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alex Forencich 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

These packages should be deleted as they were renamed some time ago: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyivi-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyvxi11-git/ Thanks Alex Forencich

2 1

[aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests [Jan 15]
by Limao Luo 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

2 1

[aur-general] Can we force the maintainer to change package name?
by Karol Blazewicz 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rstudio/ is something entirely different than every other 'rstudio' package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?&K=rstudio A few users suggested name change. Can we force the maintainer to change package name? Does the package have to be properly disowned and reuploaded with a different name?

3 9

[aur-general] tint2 packages cleanup
by WorMzy Tykashi 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Hi, Please remove (or merge with [1]) the following packages: tint2-svn-gnome-shell [2] -- using an archaic PKGBUILD template, relies on patches not included in the source array. tint2-graph [3] -- is incorrectly named (uses svn), uses old PKGBUILD template, is orphaned, and is redundant (tint2-svn applies the same patch). Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn-gnome-shell/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-graph/

2 1