- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

3 3

[aur-general] [AUR] man-pages-*fr
by Xorg 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi. I think many packages about man-pages in French are outdated. List of packages : - man-pages-fr : v3.03.0 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:35 ==> the 2013-05-20 at 15:15, I had written a comment to say the package created is empty. - man-pages-extras-fr : v0.8.1 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:36 ==> the 2013-05-20 at 15:19, I had written a comment to say the package created is empty, too. - man-pages-sup-fr : v20080606 ; last update : 2008-08-19 22:11 ==> PKGBUILD don't have a function package(), so package will be empty too. I have found this (in French, in perkamon-fr directory, README.fr file) : - Christophe Blaess <URL:http://www.blaess.fr/christophe/> : 1996-2005 - Alain Portal <URL:http://manpagesfr.free.fr/> : 2005 - Thomas Huriaux et Denis Barbier <URL:http://po4a.alioth.debian.org/> : 2006-2009 They used po4a for Debian. - Denis Barbier <URL:http://perkamon.alioth.debian.org/> : 2010 Perkamon project, to be not only for Debian. - Denis Barbier <URL:http://www.traduc.org/perkamon/> : since 2011 I think only *man-pages-fr *is useful today, but it need to be based on Perkamon project. Now, man-pages-fr can be found here : https://alioth.debian.org/frs/?group_id=100455&release_id=1879#man-pages-fr… The latest version is man-pages-fr-3.51-1 So I think man-pages-extras-fr and man-pages-sup-fr are very obsolete and deprecated today, but man-pages-fr need an upgrade. Thanks in advance. X0rg

2 4

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi, I created a right-named package for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-clearlooks-clearlux-theme/ Here it is: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-clearlux/ Please merge the former into the latter. Thanks, Edoardo

2 3

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/ Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/ since we have this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 24 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (24 total) == * fcitx-table-extra-0.3.4-1 (any) * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (i686) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (i686) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (i686) * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (i686) * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (i686) * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (i686) * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (i686) * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (x86_64) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (x86_64) * skk-jisyo-20120902-2 (any) * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (i686) * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (i686) * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (i686) * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (i686) * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (x86_64) * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (x86_64) * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (x86_64) * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * fcitx-table-extra-0.3.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * skk-jisyo-20120902-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, this package[1] is an orphaned version of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elegant-gnome/ therefore I think it should be merged into the latter one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-elegant-gtk/

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I created a package with the right name for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-sugarlike-theme/ Please merge it with: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-sugarlike/ Thanks, have a nice day. Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Removal (or merge) request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I can't see the point of this package since it just install a plain Xfce-mixer: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-oss4/ Also: it's orphaned. I think it need to be deleted. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: clerwaita theme
by Diego Principe 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Now is abandoned project... read the comment https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clearwaita-light-gtk-theme/ Diego

2 1