- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs 2. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] deletion of package g95-cocon
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Hello guys, I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/) The original developer deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull. Thanks in advance, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes

2 1

[aur-general] xmppflask deletion
by Mo0O mo0ofier 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Hello, I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I have renamed it xmppflask-hg so, as the first one -xmppflask- is now useless, could you please remove it? thanks in advance Mo0O

2 1

[aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git
by Keshav Padram 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Hi, PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efivar-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

2 1

[aur-general] clementine-rc
by Rob Til Freedmen 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ has been superseded by the final release in community I suggest removal from the AUR

2 1

[aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git
by Moritz Maxeiner 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Dear TU(s), the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines) I would like to request for the new two packages (*-git) to be merged with their old packages (*-svn), respectively. Sincerely, Moritz Maxeiner

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove stuntrally-bin
by Lone_Wolf 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Stuntrally-bin (1) is orphaned, outdated and the [community] repo has an uptodate version (2) . Please delete stuntrally-bin Lone_Wolf (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stuntrally-bin/ (2) https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stuntrally/

2 1

[aur-general] delete llvm-amdgpu-svn & lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn
by Lone_Wolf 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

llvm-amdgpu-svn (1) & lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn (2) were needed to build mesa-git master versions. llvm 3.3 is now in the official repos and built with amdgpu / R600 enabled and mesa-git master builds fine against that version, so these 2 packages are no longer needed. Please delete (1) and (2) . (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-amdgpu-svn/ (2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Bluez-aur package deleted from AUR (Mark Lee)
by Mark E. Lee 16 Jun '13

16 Jun '13

On Sunday 16 Jun 2013 11:50:29 Mark E. Lee wrote: > Why was the bluez-aur package removed from the AUR? See: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023875.html inlined below; On Sunday 16 Jun 2013 09:40:12 Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluez-aur/ > > "once bluez 5.0 is in the repos, please email aur-general and have this > deleted" --gtmanfred > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/bluez/ is bluez 5.5 Oh, I didn't know the repos were finally updated. Thanks! From, Mark -- Mark E. Lee <mark(a)markelee.com>

1 0