- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request: marble
by Diego Principe 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marble/ is an outdated clone of kdeedu-marble in extra repository *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: qbittorrent-dev
by Diego Principe 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbittorrent-dev/ now is useless *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Various requests
by Karol Blazewicz 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Is it OK to merge (transfer votes) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-classbrowser/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-classbrowser-git/ ? The former is missing source and even the website is gone, so I don't know if it's the same software. I asked for removal of other -wz packages and that left https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pplive-wz/ hanging so I guess it makes sense to remove it too. I reqested merging https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eduke32-polymer-hrp/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eduke32-hrp/ because according to the comments, the former is obsolete. These packages are not merged, so either they slipped through or there's a reason not to merge them the TU forgot to share :-) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-pdf-viewer/ and others below seem to be candidates for removal but https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/notification_plugin_unread/ says it sometimes makes sense to keep them https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rssyl/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-notification/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-gtkhtml2viewer/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-fancy/ Most of them have maintainers but the sources are gone.

2 2

[aur-general] Rename request: qbittorrent-git-nogui
by Diego Principe 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Please rename in qbittorrent-nogui-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbittorrent-git-nogui/ *Diego*

2 3

[aur-general] Merge shim-efi-x86_64-git into shim-efi-git
by Keshav Padram 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, Please merge shim-efi-x86_64-git [1] into shim-efi-git [2]. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shim-efi-x86_64-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shim-efi-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: aquaria-hib-git -> aquaria-git
by Sam S. 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, Could you please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-hib-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-git/ ? I'm the submitter and maintainer of both packages. Reasoning: Currently, aquaria-hib-git takes the proprietary Aquaria game data from the Humble Bundle archive, but replaces some game files and the executable with an improved GPL version compiled from git. Thanks to recent upstream changes to the GPL executable, it has now become possible to separate out the installation of the proprietary game files into their own package ("aquaria-data-hib"). What remains of "aquaria-hib-git" should be called "aquaria-git" to reflect this, so I have re-uploaded it under this new name. Benefits include: - proprietary and GPL stuff is no longer mixed in the same package - no need for users to supply the Humble Bundle game archive again, each time they install a new version of the executable - in the future, "aquaria-data-hib" could be complemented by drop-in alternatives like "aquaria-data-steam", "aquaria-data-demo", ... Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Jakub Klinkovský 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, from [1]: Support for the features in xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink and udlfb from the AUR have been included upstream and are no longer needed. Use the official packages instead. xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink [2] has a maintainer, but udlfb [3] is orphaned, so I think it's fine to remove it. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DisplayLink [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udlfb/

2 1

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Sébastien Leduc 22 Jun '13

22 Jun '13

Hello, Could you please merge: python2-pipeline [1] into python2-grapevine [2] and python-pipeline [3] into python-grapevine [4] ? The project changed its name upstream so 'grapevine' replaces 'pipeline'. Thanks. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pipeline/ 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-grapevine/ 3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pipeline/ 4: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-grapevine/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jun '13

22 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-3 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (i686) * r8168-8.035.00-15 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-3 (x86_64) * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (x86_64) * r8168-8.035.00-15 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Multiple requests
by Karol Blazewicz 21 Jun '13

21 Jun '13

Merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/csv2json/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/csv2json-git/notify/ It gets the code from git in both cases, so I guess the author and sumbitter decided to name it properly. Spam by joyoauto Found one more comment: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/boost-build-config What do we do about packages that host binaries in the AUR e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sub32/ , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evolution-statusicon/ or https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kio-sysinfo/ ? "I am a robot. AUR guidelines suggest to not include binaries." What is the current policy, are a few icons OK?

2 1